Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lewis Vs. Chicago

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 24, 2010

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 2 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. United Air Lines, Inc. Vs. Evans US Supreme Court · May 31, 1977
  2. Chardon Vs. Fernandez US Supreme Court · Nov 02, 1981
  3. Syllabus October Term, 2009 Lewis V. Chicago
    Search
  4. they complain. Delaware State College v. Ricks
    Search
  5. is needed for claims, such as this one, that do not require discriminatory intent. Cf., e.g., Ledbetter v. Goodyear
    Search
  6. F. 3d 488, reversed and remanded. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Lewis v. Chicago
    Search
  7. Opinion of the Court Lewis V. Chicago
    Search
  8. Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-974 Arthur L. Lewis, Jr., Et Al., Petitioners V. City
    Search
  9. Delaware State College v. Ricks
    Search
  10. a)(2). In Griggs v. Duke
    Search
  11. on one of the prohibited bases. Ibid. (emphasis added). See Ricci v. DeStefano
    Search
  12. and to create a list of the applicants above it) gave rise to a freestanding disparate-impact claim. Cf. Connecticut v. Teal
    Search
  13. insists that Evans and a line of cases following it require a different result. See also Ledbetter v. Goodyear
    Search
  14. Lorance v. AT&T
    Search
  15. see also Chardon v. Fernandez
    Search
  16. Id. , at 492 (quoting Finnegan v. Trans
    Search
  17. so that it covers only what we think is necessary to achieve what we think Congress really intended. See Oncale v. Sundowner
    Search
  18. a)(4), (b)(1), 1601.80 (2009). Cf. EEOC v. Commercial
    Search
  19. because a court may award class-wide relief even to unnamed class members who have not filed EEOC charges, see Franks v. Bowman
    Search
  20. Ledbetter v. Goodyear
    Search
  21. Court. Lewis v. Chicago
    Search
  22. Petitioners V. City
    Search
  23. In Griggs v. Duke
    Search
  24. See Ricci v. DeStefano
    Search
  25. Cf. Connecticut v. Teal
    Search
  26. Finnegan v. Trans
    Search
  27. See Oncale v. Sundowner
    Search
  28. Cf. EEOC v. Commercial
    Search
  29. Franks v. Bowman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales