Citation network
United States Vs. Marcus
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 24, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2009 United States V. MarcusSearch
-
Puckett v. UnitedSearch
-
than to assess numerous other instructional errors previously found nonstructural, see, e.g. , Hedgpeth v. PulidoSearch
-
a dissenting opinion. Sotomayor, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. United States v. MarcusSearch
-
Opinion of the Court United States V. MarcusSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-1341 United States, Petitioner V. GlennSearch
-
so long as the course of conduct continued after the enactment of the statute. See, e.g., United States v. HarrisSearch
-
United States v. DuncanSearch
-
see also United States v. OlanoSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
see also United States v. DominguezSearch
-
Johnson, supra, at 468 (quoting Arizona v. FulminanteSearch
-
including Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
and Sullivan v. LouisianaSearch
-
for example, instructing a jury as to an invalid alternative theory of guilt, Hedgpeth v. PulidoSearch
-
per curiam) , omitting mention of an element of an offense, Neder v. UnitedSearch
-
States , 527 U. S. 1 (1999), or erroneously instructing the jury on an element, Yates v. EvattSearch
-
Circuit were thus incorrect to classify the error at issue here as an Ex Post Facto Clause violation, see Marks v. UnitedSearch
-
Marcus based exclusively on noncriminal, preenactment conduct, Marcus would have a valid due process claim. Cf. Bouie v. CitySearch
-
so ordered. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. United States v. MarcusSearch
-
Stevens, J., Dissenting United States V. MarcusSearch
-
the defendant exclusively on the basis of preenactment conduct. 538 F. 3d 97, 101 (CA2 2008) (citing United States v. TorresSearch
-
F. 2d 205, 229 (1990), United States v. MonacoSearch
-
F. 3d 381, 386 (1999), and United States v. HarrisSearch
-
United States, Petitioner V. GlennSearch
-
United States v. HarrisSearch
-
United States v. DominguezSearch
-
Arizona v. FulminanteSearch
-
Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
Neder v. UnitedSearch
-
Marks v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Bouie v. CitySearch
-
United States v. TorresSearch
-
United States v. MonacoSearch
-
and United States v. HarrisSearch
-
United States v. CottonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial