Citation network
LevIn Vs. Commerce Energy, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 01, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Levin v. CommerceSearch
-
Energy, Inc. - 09-223 (2010) Syllabus October Term, 2009 Levin V. CommerceSearch
-
from entertaining claims that risk disrupting state tax administration, see Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySearch
-
s comity ruling, and remanded for adjudication of the merits. A footnote in Hibbs v. WinnSearch
-
operations, therefore their tax-enforcement methods should not be interfered with absent strong cause. See Dows v. ChicagoSearch
-
partial codification of the federal reluctance to interfere with state taxation, National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. OklahomaSearch
-
Hillsborough v. CromwellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
view constitutional challenges with the skepticism due respect for legislative choices demands. See, e.g., Hodel v. IndianaSearch
-
Madden v. KentuckySearch
-
is a matter on which the Constitution is silent. See, e.g., Heckler v. MathewsSearch
-
generally remands the case, leaving the interim remedial choice to state courts. See, e.g., McKesson Corp. v. DivisionSearch
-
how to comply with the mandate of equal treatment. See Davis v. MichiganSearch
-
Ohio Bureau of Employment Servs. v. HodorySearch
-
in the judgment, in which Scalia, J., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Levin v. CommerceSearch
-
Energy, Inc. - 09-223 (2010) Opinion of the Court Levin V. CommerceSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-223 Richard a. Levin, Tax Commissioner of Ohio, Petitioner V. CommerceSearch
-
claims for relief that risk disrupting state tax administration. See Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySearch
-
requires that a claim of the kind here presented proceed originally in state court. In so ruling, we distinguish Hibbs v. WinnSearch
-
presenting challenges to state tax measures. 554 F. 3d, at 1099, 1102 (citing Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
with the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, which had similarly read Hibbs to rein in the comity doctrine, see Levy v. PappasSearch
-
Wilbur v. LockeSearch
-
with the Fourth Circuit, which had concluded that Hibbs left comity doctrine untouched, see DIRECTV, Inc. v. TolsonSearch
-
Fair Assessment , 454 U. S., at 112 (quoting Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
Dows v. ChicagoSearch
-
Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. BoiseSearch
-
City , 213 U. S. 276 , 282 (1909). Accord Matthews v. RodgersSearch
-
Quackenbush v. AllstateSearch
-
the continuing sway of comity considerations, independent of the Act. Plaintiffs in Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSearch
-
Id., at 110. And in National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. OklahomaSearch
-
See, e.g., Griffin v. SchoolSearch
-
see Dennis v. HigginsSearch
-
Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
is a matter on which the Constitution is silent. See Heckler v. MathewsSearch
-
in more than one way. (quoting Iowa-Des Moines Nat. Bank v. BennettSearch
-
see Stanton v. StantonSearch
-
cf. United States v. BookerSearch
-
generally remands the case, leaving the remedial choice in the hands of state authorities. See, e.g., Wengler v. DruggistsSearch
-
Skinner v. OklahomaSearch
-
ex rel. Williamson , 316 U. S. 535 , 543 (1942). But see, e.g., Levy v. LouisianaSearch
-
American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSearch
-
McKesson Corp. v. DivisionSearch
-
absent certain exceptions, see, e.g., Department of Employment v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial