Citation network
Barber Vs. Thomas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 07, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2009 Barber V. ThomasSearch
-
Mistretta v. UnitedSearch
-
Muscarello v. UnitedSearch
-
BOP authority to interpret the statute more broadly, or differently than it has done here. Cf. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Stevens and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Barber v. ThomasSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Barber V. ThomasSearch
-
Jihad-Black v. ThomasSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
MO (D Ore., Oct. 27, 2008), App. 25. And in each instance the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court. Tablada v. ThomasSearch
-
see also Tablada v. ThomasSearch
-
see also White v. ScibanaSearch
-
cf. McGinnis v. RoysterSearch
-
in district courts, Mistretta v. UnitedSearch
-
is one that speakers can easily use in different ways without risk of confusion. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ClevelandSearch
-
Robinson v. ShellSearch
-
as those of the individual legislators, made after the bill in question has become law. See, e.g., Heintz v. JenkinsSearch
-
guidelines), and that as long as that interpretation is reasonable, courts must defer to it. See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
b) can be construed as imposing a criminal penalty. See Bifulco v. UnitedSearch
-
but see Sash v. ZenkSearch
-
Bifulco , supra , at 387 (quoting Ladner v. UnitedSearch
-
States , 358 U. S. 169 , 178 (1958)). See United States v. HayesSearch
-
thereof). Barber v. ThomasSearch
-
Kennedy, J., Dissenting Barber V. ThomasSearch
-
Ante , at 9 (quoting Brown v. GardnerSearch
-
Bifulco v. UnitedSearch
-
Id., at 33 (quoting Dobbert v. FloridaSearch
-
that BOP has exercised the sort of interpretive authority that would merit deference under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
To the contrary, the procedures that govern the timing of credit awards are spelled out in great detail. Cf. Lopez v. DavisSearch
-
with the force of law. United States v. MeadSearch
-
the rule. Tablada v. ThomasSearch
-
s interpretation should receive at least some deference under Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
For example, at no point did BOP consider, much less consciously reject, the interpretation outlined here. Cf. Reno v. KoraySearch
-
Cf. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
the District Court. Tablada v. ThomasSearch
-
Tablada v. ThomasSearch
-
White v. ScibanaSearch
-
Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
See Bifulco v. UnitedSearch
-
Sash v. ZenkSearch
-
Ladner v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. HayesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial