Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Holland Vs. Florida

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 14, 2010

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

67 entries 11 linked 56 unlinked
Show
  1. Day Vs. Mcdonough US Supreme Court · Apr 25, 2006
  2. Baggett Vs. Bullitt US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1964
  3. Holmberg Vs. Armbrecht US Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1946
  4. Jimenez Vs. Quarterman US Supreme Court · Jan 13, 2009
  5. Bond Vs. Moore US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  6. Pace Vs. Diguglielmo US Supreme Court · Apr 27, 2005
  7. Miller Vs. French US Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2000
  8. Munaf Vs. Geren US Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2008
  9. United States Vs. Brockamp US Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1997
  10. Slack Vs. Mcdaniel US Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2000
  11. Califano Vs. Yamasaki US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1979
  12. Syllabus October Term, 2009 Holland V. Florida
    Search
  13. Irwin v. Department
    Search
  14. substantive habeas law. Munaf v. Geren
    Search
  15. s timing provisions, would apply the presumption, see, e.g., Merck & Co. v. Reynolds
    Search
  16. d) differs significantly from the statutes at issue in United States v. Brockamp
    Search
  17. and United States v. Beggerly
    Search
  18. s timeliness was always determined under equitable principles. See, e.g., Slack v. McDaniel
    Search
  19. and prevented timely filing. Pace v. DiGuglielmo
    Search
  20. to more absolute legal rules, Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire
    Search
  21. that specific circumstances, often hard to predict, could warrant special treatment in an appropriate case. Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  22. the judgment. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined as to all but Part I. Holland v. Florida
    Search
  23. Opinion of the Court Holland V. Florida
    Search
  24. Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-5327 Albert Holland, Petitioner V. Florida
    Search
  25. F. 3d 1334, 1339 (CA11 2008) (per curiam) . In our view, this standard is too rigid. See Irwin v. Department
    Search
  26. see also Lawrence v. Florida
    Search
  27. was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed that judgment. Holland v. State
    Search
  28. later, in November 2005, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the lower court decision denying Holland relief. Holland v. State
    Search
  29. with 12 days left on the 1-year meter. See Coates v. Byrd
    Search
  30. accord, Lawrence v. Florida
    Search
  31. Helton v. Secretary
    Search
  32. taken by other Circuits, we granted the petition. Compare 539 F. 3d 1334 (case below), with, e.g., Baldayaque v. United
    Search
  33. Spitsyn v. Moore
    Search
  34. d) is subject to equitable tolling in appropriate cases. See Neverson v. Farquharson
    Search
  35. Smith v. McGinnis
    Search
  36. Miller v. New
    Search
  37. Harris v. Hutchinson
    Search
  38. Davis v. Johnson
    Search
  39. McClendon v. Sherman
    Search
  40. Taliani v. Chrans
    Search
  41. Moore v. United
    Search
  42. Calderon v. United
    Search
  43. Miller v. Marr
    Search
  44. Sandvik v. United
    Search
  45. see also Young v. United
    Search
  46. the substantive law of habeas corpus, Munaf v. Geren
    Search
  47. U. S. 327 , 340 (2000) (quoting Califano v. Yamasaki
    Search
  48. slip op., at 12). Second, the statute here differs significantly from the statutes at issue in United States v. Brockamp
    Search
  49. U. S. 347 (1997), and United States v. Beggerly
    Search
  50. Clay v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial