Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Schwab Vs. Reilly

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 14, 2010

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 5 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Rousey Vs. Jacoway US Supreme Court · Apr 04, 2005
  2. Owen Vs. Owen US Supreme Court · May 23, 1991
  3. United States Vs. Budd US Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1892
  4. Kawaauhau Vs. Geiger US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1998
  5. Burlingham Vs. Crouse US Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1913
  6. Syllabus October Term, 2009 Schwab V. Reilly
    Search
  7. Taylor v. Freeland
    Search
  8. JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, J., joined. Schwab v. Reilly
    Search
  9. Opinion of the Court Schwab V. Reilly
    Search
  10. Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-538 William G. Schwab, Petitioner V. Nadejda
    Search
  11. s exemptions were objectionable under the Code. See Lamie v. United
    Search
  12. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union
    Search
  13. d)(5) and (6), see, e.g. , Duncan v. Walker
    Search
  14. Specify the Statute Creating the Exemption Value Claimed Exempt Proceeds from lawsuit Winn v. TWA
    Search
  15. Taylor and ignore the presumption that parties act lawfully and with knowledge of the law, cf. United States v. Budd
    Search
  16. see Marrama v. Citizens
    Search
  17. Brief for Respondent 33 (citing Kawaauhau v. Geiger
    Search
  18. title in the asset to the debtor. But that does not establish the statutory entitlement Reilly claims. Schwab v. Reilly
    Search
  19. Ginsburg, J., Dissenting Schwab V. Reilly
    Search
  20. s fresh start, and thus best fulfills the prime purpose of the exemption prescriptions. See, e.g., Burlingham v. Crouse
    Search
  21. See also Rousey v. Jacoway
    Search
  22. United States v. Security
    Search
  23. s schedules.). Our decision in Taylor v. Freeland
    Search
  24. William G. Schwab, Petitioner V. Nadejda
    Search
  25. the Code. See Lamie v. United
    Search
  26. Duncan v. Walker
    Search
  27. Winn v. TWA
    Search
  28. Marrama v. Citizens
    Search
  29. United States v. Locke
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales