Citation network
Magwood Vs. Patterson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 24, 2010
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2009 Magwood V. PattersonSearch
-
b) is consistent with its precedents. Because none of the pre-AEDPA cases that the State invokes, e.g., Wong Doo v. UnitedSearch
-
no light on the question presented here. Nor do post-AEDPA cases contradict the approach adopted here. Only Burton v. StewartSearch
-
Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg and Alito, JJ., joined. Magwood v. PattersonSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Magwood V. PattersonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 09-158 Billy Joe Magwood, Petitioner V. TonySearch
-
against the two mitigating factors, the court approved the sentence of death. The Alabama courts affirmed. See Magwood v. StateSearch
-
Ex parte Magwood, 426 So. 2d 929, 932 (Ala. 1983). We denied certiorari. Magwood v. AlabamaSearch
-
See Magwood v. SmithSearch
-
MD Ala. 1985). The Court of Appeals affirmed. See Magwood v. SmithSearch
-
The Alabama courts affirmed, see Magwood v. StateSearch
-
Ex parte Magwood , 548 So. 2d 516, 516 (Ala. 1988), and this Court denied certiorari, see Magwood v. AlabamaSearch
-
Criminal Appeals affirmed, citing its decision on direct appeal as to the propriety of the death sentence. See Magwood v. StateSearch
-
So. 2d 959, 965 (1996) (citing Kyzer, 399 So. 2d 330 , and Jackson v. StateSearch
-
The Alabama Supreme Court denied certiorari, see 689 So. 2d, at 959, as did this Court, see Magwood v. AlabamaSearch
-
writ of habeas corpus challenging his new death sentence, which the District Court conditionally granted. See Magwood v. CulliverSearch
-
id ., at 24 (citing Artuz v. BennettSearch
-
citing Beyer v. LitscherSearch
-
see also Gonzalez v. CrosbySearch
-
applications where the petitioners did not avail themselves of prior opportunities to present the claims. See Wong Doo v. UnitedSearch
-
ed., Supp. II), and applied only to applications raising previously adjudicated claims, see Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
C Nor do our post -AEDPA cases contradict our approach. Only one, Burton v. StewartSearch
-
procedural default will bar federal review. See Coleman v. ThompsonSearch
-
Sullivan v. BoerckelSearch
-
Castro v. UnitedSearch
-
at all. v. TheSearch
-
s coram nobis petition, see Magwood v. StateSearch
-
Footnote 6 In Jackson v. StateSearch
-
Footnote 8 In Slack v. McDanielSearch
-
the prisoner challenged the same state-court judgment once before. Three times we have held otherwise. See Slack v. McDanielSearch
-
as we have previously defined it. Footnote 13 Cf. Walker v. RothSearch
-
Lang v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. EspositoSearch
-
a). Magwood v. PattersonSearch
-
B. The Court neither purports to alter nor does alter our holding in Panetti v. QuartermanSearch
-
s decision today and our decision in Panetti fit comfortably together. Magwood v. PattersonSearch
-
Wong Doo v. UnitedSearch
-
Only Burton v. StewartSearch
-
Billy Joe Magwood, Petitioner V. TonySearch
-
See Magwood v. StateSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial