Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Arizona Vs. Johnson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 26, 2009

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 4 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Berkemer Vs. Mccarty US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1984
  2. Michigan Vs. Long US Supreme Court · Jul 06, 1983
  3. Pennsylvania Vs. Mimms US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1977
  4. Knowles Vs. Iowa US Supreme Court · Nov 03, 1998
  5. Syllabus October Term, 2008 Arizona V. Johnson
    Search
  6. Decided January 26, 2009 In Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  7. the driver and all passengers. Brendlin v. California
    Search
  8. Maryland v. Wilson
    Search
  9. s application in a traffic-stop setting. In Pennsylvania v. Mimms
    Search
  10. s duration. See Muehler v. Mena
    Search
  11. P. 3d 667, reversed and remanded. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Arizona v. Johnson
    Search
  12. Opinion of the Court Arizona V. Johnson
    Search
  13. Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-1122 Arizona, Petitioner V. Lemon
    Search
  14. in a motor vehicle temporarily seized upon police detection of a traffic infraction. In a pathmarking decision, Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  15. s leading decision in Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  16. U. S. 408 , 414 (1997) (quoting Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  17. and Brendlin v. California
    Search
  18. clear why the prosecutor, in opposing the suppression motion, sought to portray the episode as consensual. Cf. Florida v. Bostick
    Search
  19. other than a lawful seizure, so long as those inquiries do not measurably extend the duration of the stop. See Muehler v. Mena
    Search
  20. Ariz. 58, 64, 170 P. 3d 667, 673 (2007). That position, however, appears at odds with our decision in Maryland v. Wilson
    Search
  21. In Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  22. Brendlin v. California
    Search
  23. In Pennsylvania v. Mimms
    Search
  24. See Muehler v. Mena
    Search
  25. Court. Arizona v. Johnson
    Search
  26. Arizona, Petitioner V. Lemon
    Search
  27. Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  28. Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  29. Cf. Florida v. Bostick
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial