Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Hayes

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 24, 2009

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

40 entries 4 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Barnhart Vs. Thomas US Supreme Court · Nov 12, 2003
  2. United States Vs. Shabani US Supreme Court · Oct 03, 1994
  3. United States Vs. Barnes US Supreme Court · Jan 09, 1912
  4. Bragdon Vs. Abbott US Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1998
  5. Syllabus October Term, 2008 United States V. Hayes
    Search
  6. Huddleston v. United
    Search
  7. as to all but Part III. Roberts, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, J., joined. United States v. Hayes
    Search
  8. Opinion of the Court United States V. Hayes
    Search
  9. Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-608 United States, Petitioner V. Randy
    Search
  10. United States v. Meade
    Search
  11. See, e.g. , United States v. Belless
    Search
  12. relationship between aggressor and victim. See id ., at 761 (Williams, J., dissenting). See also United States v. Barnes
    Search
  13. C) to bear the same meaning. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit
    Search
  14. quoting Bragdon v. Abbott
    Search
  15. Bifulco v. United
    Search
  16. bold typeface deleted). Footnote 3 See United States v. Heckenliable
    Search
  17. United States v. Belless
    Search
  18. White v. Department
    Search
  19. United States v. Shelton
    Search
  20. United States v. Kavoukian
    Search
  21. United States v. Smith
    Search
  22. St. Louis v. Missouri
    Search
  23. a)(33)(A)(ii) to the perpetrator. United States v. Hayes
    Search
  24. Roberts, C. J., Dissenting United States V. Hayes
    Search
  25. see Rowland v. California
    Search
  26. of the statute, and we have recognized that structure is often critical in resolving verbal ambiguity. See Castillo v. United
    Search
  27. was passed and after the House of Representatives had passed the pertinent provision. See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah
    Search
  28. Board of Governors, FRS v. Dimension
    Search
  29. Taylor v. United
    Search
  30. see Shepard v. United
    Search
  31. Crandon v. United
    Search
  32. United States, Petitioner V. Randy
    Search
  33. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit
    Search
  34. See United States v. Heckenliable
    Search
  35. St. Louis v. Missouri
    Search
  36. Rowland v. California
    Search
  37. See Castillo v. United
    Search
  38. See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah
    Search
  39. Shepard v. United
    Search
  40. United States v. Chavez
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales