Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Negusie Vs. Holder

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 03, 2009

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

71 entries 8 linked 63 unlinked
Show
  1. ins Vs. Aguirre-aguirre US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1999
  2. ins Vs. Abudu US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1988
  3. Dada Vs. Mukasey US Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2008
  4. Gonzales Vs. Thomas US Supreme Court · Apr 17, 2006
  5. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections Vs. Yeskey US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1998
  6. Lorillard Vs. Pons US Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1978
  7. ins Vs. Cardoza-fonseca US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1987
  8. Traynor Vs. Turnage US Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1988
  9. Syllabus October Term, 2008 Negusie V. Holder
    Search
  10. persecution was coerced or otherwise the product of duress. The BIA followed its earlier decisions finding Fedorenko v. United
    Search
  11. a) Under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  12. the BIA is entitled to deference in interpreting ambiguous INA provisions, see, e.g., INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre
    Search
  13. INS v. Orlando
    Search
  14. the statute, the proper course is to remand to it for additional investigation or explanation, e.g., Gonzales v. Thomas
    Search
  15. in part and dissenting in part, in which Breyer, J., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Negusie v. Holder
    Search
  16. Opinion of the Court Negusie V. Holder
    Search
  17. Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-499 Daniel Girmai Negusie, Petitioner V. Eric
    Search
  18. coerced or otherwise the product of duress. In so ruling the BIA followed its earlier decisions that found Fedorenko v. United
    Search
  19. II Consistent with the rule in Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  20. Aguirre-Aguirre , supra , at 425 (quoting INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca
    Search
  21. slip op., at 13) (quoting Gozlon-Peretz v. United
    Search
  22. per curiam) (quoting Ventura , 537 U. S., at 16, in turn quoting Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion
    Search
  23. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand
    Search
  24. see also Cajun Elec. Power Cooperative, Inc. v. FERC
    Search
  25. Appeals and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Negusie v. Holder
    Search
  26. Scalia, J., Concurring Negusie V. Holder
    Search
  27. the United States. I agree that the agency is entitled to answer that question. Ibid. See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  28. s decision in Fedorenko v. United
    Search
  29. Prosecutor v. Erdemovi
    Search
  30. Brief for Petitioner 32 (quoting Morissette v. United
    Search
  31. Fong Yue Ting v. United
    Search
  32. often poor-quality) translation, events that took place years ago in foreign, usually impoverished countries. See Dia v. Ashcroft
    Search
  33. Castillo v. Gonzales
    Search
  34. a), at 73. Negusie v. Holder
    Search
  35. Thomas, J., Dissenting Negusie V. Holder
    Search
  36. The Court of Appeals affirmed. See Negusie v. Gonzales
    Search
  37. See Jimenez v. Quarterman
    Search
  38. slip op., at 5) (citing Lamie v. United
    Search
  39. National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders
    Search
  40. slip op., at 18) (quoting Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  41. Corp. v. Cartier
    Search
  42. Russello v. United
    Search
  43. an activity, or help it to occur in some way. Reves v. Ernst
    Search
  44. see also Amoco Production Co. v. Gambell
    Search
  45. see, e.g. , Barnhart v. Sigmon
    Search
  46. specifically addressed elsewhere in the federal immigration regime (regulations implementing the CAT). Varity Corp. v. Howe
    Search
  47. see also Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis
    Search
  48. that addresses the specific problem at issue in a conflicting way. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Russell
    Search
  49. Fedorenko v. United
    Search
  50. Under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial