Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Vaden Vs. Discover Bank

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 09, 2009

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

66 entries 7 linked 59 unlinked
Show
  1. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. Vs. Cardegna US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2006
  2. Preston Vs. Ferrer US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2008
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. Vs. Haworth US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1937
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Vs. Byrd US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1985
  5. Southland Corp. Vs. Keating US Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1984
  6. Beneficial Nat. Bank Vs. Anderson US Supreme Court · Jun 02, 2003
  7. Allied-bruce Terminix Cos. Vs. Dobson US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1995
  8. Vaden v. Discover
    Search
  9. Bank - 07-773 (2009) Syllabus October Term, 2008 Vaden V. Discover
    Search
  10. ordered arbitration. The Fourth Circuit then affirmed. The Court of Appeals recognized that, in Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado
    Search
  11. is equally binding on state and federal courts. Southland Corp. v. Keating
    Search
  12. dispute. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel
    Search
  13. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Mottley
    Search
  14. federal law if the law governing the complaint is exclusively federal, see Beneficial Nat. Bank v. Anderson
    Search
  15. between the parties. See Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury
    Search
  16. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler
    Search
  17. an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Stevens, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Vaden v. Discover
    Search
  18. Bank - 07-773 (2009) Opinion of the Court Vaden V. Discover
    Search
  19. Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-773 Betty E. Vaden, Petitioner V. Discover
    Search
  20. s decision in Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado
    Search
  21. petition. Compare Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk
    Search
  22. Smith Barney, Inc. v. Sarver
    Search
  23. Westmoreland Capital Corp. v. Findlay
    Search
  24. and Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Fitch
    Search
  25. CA5 1992) (same), with Community State Bank v. Strong
    Search
  26. slip op., at 5) (quoting Southland Corp. v. Keating
    Search
  27. binding on state and federal courts. Southland , 465 U. S., at 12 (quoting Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury
    Search
  28. accord Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson
    Search
  29. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction
    Search
  30. ouster notion no longer holds sway. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. v. Valenzuela
    Search
  31. discussed in Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd
    Search
  32. See also Taylor v. Anderson
    Search
  33. See also Walther v. Sovereign
    Search
  34. s finance charges. We therefore express no opinion on those issues. Cf. Beneficial Nat. Bank v. Anderson
    Search
  35. Footnote 6 In Community State Bank v. Strong
    Search
  36. Brief for Petitioner 38. Footnote 10 Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado
    Search
  37. Footnote 11 The Court noted in Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction
    Search
  38. and 4 apply to proceedings in state courts, see Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board
    Search
  39. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. , 489 U. S. 468 , 477, n. 6 (1989), and we do not do so here. Vaden v. Discover
    Search
  40. Bank - 07-773 (2009) Opinion of Roberts, C. J. Vaden V. Discover
    Search
  41. jurisdiction over a state-court claim it does not seek to arbitrate is a mystery. Cf. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury
    Search
  42. no complaint will have been filed. See Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida
    Search
  43. analogous to the jurisdictional analysis in a typical declaratory judgment action. See Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction
    Search
  44. Gully v. First
    Search
  45. to arise under federal law. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips
    Search
  46. of the state-law dispute itself. Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado
    Search
  47. Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado
    Search
  48. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel
    Search
  49. See Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury
    Search
  50. Opinion of the Court Vaden V. Discover
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial