Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Knowles Vs. Mirzayance

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 24, 2009

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 2 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Schriro Vs. Landrigan US Supreme Court · May 14, 2007
  2. Yarborough Vs. Gentry US Supreme Court · Oct 20, 2003
  3. Syllabus October Term, 2008 Knowles V. Mirzayance
    Search
  4. s recommendation to withdraw the NGI plea constituted ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington
    Search
  5. to decline to apply a specific legal rule that has not been squarely established by this Court. See, e.g., Wright v. Van
    Search
  6. and Alito, JJ., joined, and in which Scalia, Souter, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined as to all but Part II. Knowles v. Mirzayance
    Search
  7. Opinion of the Court Knowles V. Mirzayance
    Search
  8. Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-1315 Michael a. Knowles, Warden, Petitioner V. Alexandre
    Search
  9. s performance was ineffective, see Strickland v. Washington
    Search
  10. Appeal affirmed without offering any reason for its rejection of this particular ineffective assistance claim. People v. Mirzayance
    Search
  11. s recommendation to withdraw the NGI plea. Mirzayance v. Hickman
    Search
  12. Mirzayance v. Knowles
    Search
  13. or understanding the nature of his act or of distinguishing right from wrong at the time of the offense. See People v. Lawley
    Search
  14. The District Court accepted this recommendation and granted the writ. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Mirzayance v. Knowles
    Search
  15. opinion, and remanded for further consideration in light of Carey v. Musladin
    Search
  16. state court to decline to apply a specific legal rule that has not been squarely established by this Court. See Wright v. Van
    Search
  17. court has even more latitude to reasonably determine that a defendant has not satisfied that standard. See Yarborough v. Alvarado
    Search
  18. d)(1) standard, see Yarborough v. Gentry
    Search
  19. Anderson v. Bessemer
    Search
  20. The law does not require counsel to raise every available nonfrivolous defense. See Jones v. Barnes
    Search
  21. cf. Wiggins v. Smith
    Search
  22. d). See United States v. International
    Search
  23. Things, Ltd. v. United
    Search
  24. s claim was required. See Mirzayance v. Hickman
    Search
  25. Strickland v. Washington
    Search
  26. Wright v. Van
    Search
  27. Part II. Knowles v. Mirzayance
    Search
  28. Michael a. Knowles, Warden, Petitioner V. Alexandre
    Search
  29. People v. Mirzayance
    Search
  30. Mirzayance v. Hickman
    Search
  31. See People v. Lawley
    Search
  32. of Carey v. Musladin
    Search
  33. Court. See Wright v. Van
    Search
  34. See Yarborough v. Alvarado
    Search
  35. See Jones v. Barnes
    Search
  36. Wiggins v. Smith
    Search
  37. See United States v. International
    Search
  38. See Mirzayance v. Hickman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales