Citation network
Rivera Vs. Illinois
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 31, 2009
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2008 Rivera V. IllinoisSearch
-
against him. The trial court rejected the peremptory challenge out of concern that it was discriminatory. Under Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
its own laws. There is no freestanding constitutional right to peremptory challenges. See, e.g. , United States v. Martinez-SalazarSearch
-
U. S. 81 , 89, which a State may decline to offer at all, Georgia v. McCollumSearch
-
a state-provided peremptory challenge does not, without more, violate the Federal Constitution. See, e.g., Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
a state-provided peremptory challenge requires reversal as a matter of federal law. He relies on a suggestion in Swain v. AlabamaSearch
-
to adjudicate the controversy, resulting in a judgment invalid as a matter of federal law. See , e.g. , Nguyen v. UnitedSearch
-
Ill. 2d 1, 879 N. E. 2d 876, affirmed. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Rivera v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Opinion of the Court Rivera V. IllinoisSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-9995 Michael Rivera, Petitioner V. IllinoisSearch
-
Under Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
Id ., at 16, 879 N. E. 2d, at 885 (quoting Swain v. AlabamaSearch
-
N. E. 2d, at 887 (citing Washington v. RecuencoSearch
-
Id., at 21, 879 N. E. 2d, at 887 (quoting Neder v. UnitedSearch
-
s conviction as a matter of federal law. Compare Angus v. StateSearch
-
State v. VreenSearch
-
same), with People v. BellSearch
-
have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in their state-provided peremptory challenge rights. Cf. Evitts v. LuceySearch
-
and have made clear that a State may decline to offer them at all. McCollum , 505 U. S., at 57. See also Holland v. IllinoisSearch
-
Frazier v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 107 , 121, n. 21 (1982) (internal quotation marks omitted). See also Estelle v. McGuireSearch
-
U. S., at 86, 87. Similarly, dismissal of a juror in violation of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
we have held, is constitutional error that requires vacation of a death sentence. See Gray v. MississippiSearch
-
U. S. 648 (1987). See also Gomez v. UnitedSearch
-
We have held the resulting judgment in such cases invalid as a matter of federal law. See , e.g. , Nguyen v. UnitedSearch
-
s case file) (detailing peremptory challenge rules by State). Footnote 2 Under Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Swain v. AlabamaSearch
-
Nguyen v. UnitedSearch
-
Court. Rivera v. IllinoisSearch
-
Michael Rivera, Petitioner V. IllinoisSearch
-
Neder v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Angus v. StateSearch
-
People v. BellSearch
-
Cf. Evitts v. LuceySearch
-
Holland v. IllinoisSearch
-
of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
See Gray v. MississippiSearch
-
Gomez v. UnitedSearch
-
Under Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Engle v. IsaacSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial