Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Entergy Corp. Vs. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 01, 2009

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

51 entries 2 linked 49 unlinked
Show
  1. Barnhart Vs. Walton US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2002
  2. Thomas Jefferson Univ. Vs. Shalala US Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1994
  3. Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper
    Search
  4. Inc. - 07-588 (2009) Syllabus October Term, 2008 Entergy Corp. V. Riverkeeper
    Search
  5. possible interpretation, nor even the interpretation deemed most reasonable by the courts. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  6. PSEG Fossil LLC et al. v. Riverkeeper
    Search
  7. Utility Water Act Group v. Riverkeeper
    Search
  8. Inc., et al., also on certiorari to the same court. Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper
    Search
  9. Inc. - 07-588 (2009) Opinion of the Court Entergy Corp. V. Riverkeeper
    Search
  10. challenged those regulations, and the Second Circuit set them aside. Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  11. agency had failed to adhere to the procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. Appalachian Power Co. v. Train
    Search
  12. b). See Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Whitman
    Search
  13. d). These regulations were upheld in large part by the Second Circuit in Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  14. see EPA v. National
    Search
  15. our decisions in Whitman v. American
    Search
  16. Trucking Assns., Inc. , 531 U. S. 457 (2001), and American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. Donovan
    Search
  17. has been proceeding in essentially this fashion for over 30 years. See Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
    Search
  18. Seacoast Anti-Pollution League v. Costle
    Search
  19. extract less water from the adjacent waterway, proportionately reducing impingement and entrainment. Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  20. the Fifth Circuit, where proceedings have been stayed pending disposition of these cases. See ConocoPhillips Co. v. EPA
    Search
  21. Fed. Reg. 13541 (2003). Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper
    Search
  22. Inc. - 07-588 (2009) Stevens, J., Dissenting Entergy Corp. V. Riverkeeper
    Search
  23. American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. Donovan
    Search
  24. Whitman v. American
    Search
  25. design. Although Congress realized that technology standards would necessarily put some firms out of business, see EPA v. National
    Search
  26. that Congress intend to control, not delegate, when cost-benefit analysis should be used. See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  27. See, e.g. , Allison Engine Co. v. United
    Search
  28. Russello v. United
    Search
  29. intake structures. Entrainment occurs when these organisms are drawn into the intake structures. See Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  30. cooling water requires less water to be withdrawn and thus fewer aquatic organisms to be killed. Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  31. longstanding yet impermissible agency practice cannot ripen into permissible agency practice. Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper
    Search
  32. Inc. - 07-588 (2009) Opinion of Breyer, J. Entergy Corp. V. Riverkeeper
    Search
  33. Station, Units 1 and 2) , 1 E. A. D. 332, 340 (1977), remanded on other grounds, Seacoast Anti-Pollution League v. Costle
    Search
  34. legislative history included. Hence it is lawful. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  35. the EPA must adequately explain why it has changed its standard. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State
    Search
  36. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand
    Search
  37. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  38. Opinion of the Court Entergy Corp. V. Riverkeeper
    Search
  39. Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  40. of the Administrative Procedure Act. Appalachian Power Co. v. Train
    Search
  41. See Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Whitman
    Search
  42. EPA v. National
    Search
  43. and American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. Donovan
    Search
  44. See Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
    Search
  45. See ConocoPhillips Co. v. EPA
    Search
  46. Stevens, J., Dissenting Entergy Corp. V. Riverkeeper
    Search
  47. See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  48. Allison Engine Co. v. United
    Search
  49. See Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  50. Opinion of Breyer, J. Entergy Corp. V. Riverkeeper
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial