Citation network
Nken Vs. Holder
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 22, 2009
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2008 Nken V. HolderSearch
-
Reno v. American-ArabSearch
-
Virginian R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. MayacamasSearch
-
Similarly, simply showing some possibility of irreparable injury fails to satisfy the second factor. See Winter v. NaturalSearch
-
opinion, in which Scalia, J., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Nken v. HolderSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Nken V. HolderSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-681 Jean Marc Nken, Petitioner V. EricSearch
-
while it considers an appeal, Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
f)(2). See Teshome-Gebreegziabher v. MukaseySearch
-
S. Attorney General , 287 F. 3d 1335 (CA11 2002), with Arevalo v. AshcroftSearch
-
F. 3d 1 (CA1 2003), Mohammed v. RenoSearch
-
F. 3d 95 (CA2 2002), Douglas v. AshcroftSearch
-
F. 3d 230 (CA3 2004), Tesfamichael v. GonzalesSearch
-
F. 3d 169 (CA5 2005), Bejjani v. INSSearch
-
F. 3d 670 (CA6 2001), Hor v. GonzalesSearch
-
F. 3d 482 (CA7 2005), and Andreiu v. AshcroftSearch
-
s removal pending further order of this Court. Nken v. MukaseySearch
-
Second, because courts were no longer prohibited from proceeding with review once an alien departed, see Dada v. MukaseySearch
-
Robinson v. ShellSearch
-
Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Assn. v. FederalSearch
-
Responsible Energy, Inc. v. NRCSearch
-
see also Brown v. GilmoreSearch
-
choices into consideration when interpreting statutory provisions. See, e.g. , Florida Dept. of Revenue v. PiccadillySearch
-
Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSearch
-
bears the burden of showing that the circumstances justify an exercise of that discretion. See, e.g. , Clinton v. JonesSearch
-
Landis v. NorthSearch
-
Martin v. FranklinSearch
-
Capital Corp. , 546 U. S. 132 , 139 (2005) (quoting United States v. BurrSearch
-
at 776. There is substantial overlap between these and the factors governing preliminary injunctions, see Winter v. NaturalSearch
-
Sofinet v. INSSearch
-
Abbassi v. INSSearch
-
serious burden for many aliens, it is not categorically irreparable, as some courts have said. See, e.g. , Ofosu v. McElroySearch
-
Post , at 7 (quoting Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy, Inc. v. NRCSearch
-
is considered a stay. See Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
because it suspends the effect of the removal order. Nken v. HolderSearch
-
Kennedy, J., Concurring Nken V. HolderSearch
-
removal of an alien pending judicial review. This is the less stringent of the two standards at issue. See Kenyeres v. AshcroftSearch
-
extraordinary remedy that should not be granted in the ordinary case, much less awarded as of right. Virginian R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Winter v. NaturalSearch
-
See Winter v. NaturalSearch
-
Jean Marc Nken, Petitioner V. EricSearch
-
See Teshome-Gebreegziabher v. MukaseySearch
-
Arevalo v. AshcroftSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial