Citation network
Fcc Vs. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 28, 2009
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
FCC v. FoxSearch
-
Television Stations, Inc. - 07-582 (2009) Syllabus October Term, 2008 Fcc V. FoxSearch
-
which includes references to sexual or excretory activity or organs, see FCC v. PacificaSearch
-
Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. StateSearch
-
review. Although an agency must ordinarily display awareness that it is changing position, see United States v. NixonSearch
-
opinions. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Stevens, Souter, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. FCC v. FoxSearch
-
Television Stations, Inc. - 07-582 (2009) Opinion of the Court Fcc V. FoxSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-582 Federal Communications Commission, Et Al., Petitioners V. FoxSearch
-
which includes expletives referring to sexual or excretory activity or organs, see FCC v. PacificaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Id., at 98. In FCC v. PacificaSearch
-
Television v. FCCSearch
-
authority to review executive agency action for procedural correctness, see Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NaturalSearch
-
Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-BestSearch
-
quoting New York Council, Assn. of Civilian Technicians v. FLRASearch
-
when an agency reverses course. NAACP v. FCCSearch
-
depart from a prior policy sub silentio or simply disregard rules that are still on the books. See United States v. NixonSearch
-
or when its prior policy has engendered serious reliance interests that must be taken into account. Smiley v. CitibankSearch
-
that ambiguous statutory language be construed to avoid serious constitutional doubts. See Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. FloridaSearch
-
U. S., at 749 (quoting Ginsberg v. NewSearch
-
prohibits federal agencies from moving in an incremental manner. Cf. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. BrandSearch
-
d sub nom. Morrison v. OlsonSearch
-
Leaving aside the unconstitutionality of a scheme giving the power to enforce laws to agents of Congress, see Bowsher v. SynarSearch
-
than that we have given to the Environmental Protection Agency, which is not an independent agency. See Massachusetts v. EPASearch
-
Whitman v. AmericanSearch
-
There is no reason to magnify the separation-of-powers dilemma posed by the Headless Fourth Branch, see Freytag v. CommissionerSearch
-
phrase and upon a passage quoted in State Farm from a plurality opinion in Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. WichitaSearch
-
s interpretation of the statute erroneous. See Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. ArmySearch
-
NLRB v. CatholicSearch
-
Washington Legal Foundation v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Ethnic Employees of Library of Congress v. BoorstinSearch
-
Television Stations, Inc. - 07-582 (2009) Thomas, J., Concurring Fcc V. FoxSearch
-
assertion of constitutional authority to regulate the programming at issue in this case. See Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCCSearch
-
FCC v. PacificaSearch
-
in these cases. Denver Area Ed. Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. FCCSearch
-
on broadcast speech to federal regulation of telephone dial-in services, see Sable Communications of Cal., Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
cable television programming, see Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
U. S. 622 , 637 (1994), and the Internet, see Reno v. AmericanSearch
-
Consumer Electronics Assn. v. FCCSearch
-
from precedent under the prevailing approach to stare decisis . See Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySearch
-
see also American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Fcc V. FoxSearch
-
Petitioners V. FoxSearch
-
In FCC v. PacificaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial