Citation network
Nijhawan Vs. Holder
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 2009
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2008 Nijhawan V. HolderSearch
-
interpretation rests upon Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
States , 495 U. S. 575 , Chambers v. UnitedSearch
-
and James v. UnitedSearch
-
and similar statutory structure in two adjoining provisions, it normally intends similar interpretations. IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSearch
-
F. 3d 387, affirmed. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Nijhawan v. HolderSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Nijhawan V. HolderSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 08-495 Manoj Nijhawan, Petitioner V. EricSearch
-
or more. See Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
statute or to the factual circumstances surrounding commission of the crime on a specific occasion. Compare Conteh v. GonzalesSearch
-
Arguelles-Olivares v. MukaseySearch
-
F. 3d 171, 178 (CA5 2008) (same), with Dulal-Whiteway v. UnitedSearch
-
Kawashima v. MukaseySearch
-
Obasohan v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
engaged on a specific occasion, say, the fraud that the defendant planned and executed last month. See Chambers v. UnitedSearch
-
interpretation rests upon Taylor, Chambers, and James v. UnitedSearch
-
of the factual basis for the plea. Shepard v. UnitedSearch
-
See, e.g. , Estrada-Espinoza v. MukaseySearch
-
Singh v. AshcroftSearch
-
Santos v. GonzalesSearch
-
See Gousse v. AshcroftSearch
-
Fernandez v. MukaseySearch
-
Steele v. BlackmanSearch
-
and 2422 would be pointless. But see Gertsenshteyn v. UnitedSearch
-
do not believe Congress would have intended (M)(i) to apply in so limited and so haphazard a manner. Cf. United States v. HayesSearch
-
see, e.g. , Alaka v. AttorneySearch
-
Knutsen v. GonzalesSearch
-
Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
Chambers v. UnitedSearch
-
Court. Nijhawan v. HolderSearch
-
Manoj Nijhawan, Petitioner V. EricSearch
-
See Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Conteh v. GonzalesSearch
-
Dulal-Whiteway v. UnitedSearch
-
See Chambers v. UnitedSearch
-
Taylor, Chambers, and James v. UnitedSearch
-
Shepard v. UnitedSearch
-
Estrada-Espinoza v. MukaseySearch
-
Gertsenshteyn v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. United States v. HayesSearch
-
Alaka v. AttorneySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial