Citation network
Forest Grove School Dist. Vs. T. A.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 2009
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
i)(2)(C)(iii). See School Comm. of Burlington v. DepartmentSearch
-
a) This Court held in Burlington and Florence County School Dist. Four v. CarterSearch
-
be aware of, and to adopt, a judicial interpretation of a statute when it reenacts that law without change, Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
require the district to reimburse the parents for the cost of the private education. See School Comm. of Burlington v. DepartmentSearch
-
Eight years later, we unanimously reaffirmed the availability of reimbursement in Florence County School Dist. Four v. CarterSearch
-
a)(10)(C) are thus best read as elucidative rather than exhaustive. Cf. United States v. AtlanticSearch
-
i)(2)(C)(iii). See Branch v. SmithSearch
-
s acceptance of funds must be stated unambiguously. See Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 17 (1981). Applying that principle, we held in Arlington Central School Dist. Bd. of Ed. v. MurphySearch
-
generally presume that public-school officials are properly performing their obligations under IDEA. See Schaffer v. WeastSearch
-
Footnote 3 Compare Frank G. v. BoardSearch
-
does not bar reimbursement for students who have not previously received public special-education services), and M. M. v. SchoolSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of Miami-Dade Cty., Fla. , 437 F. 3d 1085, 1099 (CA11 2006) (per curiam) (same), with Greenland School Dist. v. AmySearch
-
We previously granted certiorari to address this question in Board of Ed. of City School Dist. of New York v. TomSearch
-
failure to limit the type of private-school placements for which parents may be reimbursed. School Comm. of Burlington v. DepartmentSearch
-
see Florence County School Dist. Four v. CarterSearch
-
i)(2)(C)(iii), it implicitly adopted that construction of the statute. See Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
Scalia and Justice Thomas join, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. School Comm. of Burlington v. DepartmentSearch
-
Corley v. UnitedSearch
-
citing Branch v. SmithSearch
-
citing Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
with the holdings of Burlington and the other prior decision on the subject, Florence County School Dist. Four v. CarterSearch
-
allows for a motion to dismiss after 30 days. See also Carlisle v. UnitedSearch
-
provisions are irreconcilable, the presumption against implied repeals gives way to the later enactment. See Branch v. SmithSearch
-
Footnote 5 The majority argues that we already rejected this process as inadequate in School Comm. of Burlington v. DepartmentSearch
-
See School Comm. of Burlington v. DepartmentSearch
-
Burlington and Florence County School Dist. Four v. CarterSearch
-
Cf. United States v. AtlanticSearch
-
See Branch v. SmithSearch
-
See Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
IDEA. See Schaffer v. WeastSearch
-
Compare Frank G. v. BoardSearch
-
and M. M. v. SchoolSearch
-
Greenland School Dist. v. AmySearch
-
Board of Ed. of City School Dist. of New York v. TomSearch
-
School Comm. of Burlington v. DepartmentSearch
-
See Lorillard v. PonsSearch
-
Branch v. SmithSearch
-
Carlisle v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial