Citation network
Bobby Vs. Van Hook
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 09, 2009
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Bobby v. VanSearch
-
Hook - 09-144 (2009) Bobby v. VanSearch
-
Hook - 09-144 (2009) Per Curiam Bobby V. VanSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States David Bobby, Warden V. RobertSearch
-
first strangling him until he was unconscious, then killing him with a kitchen knife and mutilating his body. State v. VanSearch
-
State v. VanSearch
-
WL 11202 (Ohio App., May 13, 1987) (per curiam) , and we denied certiorari, Van Hook v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 1100 (1989). Van Hook also sought state postconviction relief, which the Ohio courts denied. State v. VanSearch
-
Hook filed this federal habeas petition in 1995. The District Court denied relief on all 17 of his claims. Van Hook v. AndersonSearch
-
s confession was unconstitutionally obtained under Edwards v. ArizonaSearch
-
U. S. 477 (1981). See Van Hook v. AndersonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
s other claims. See Van Hook v. AndersonSearch
-
F. 3d 411, 428 (2007). Van Hook petitioned for a writ of certiorari, which we denied. Van Hook v. HudsonSearch
-
and relied on a presentence investigation report without objecting to damaging evidence it contained. See Van Hook v. AndersonSearch
-
opinion, but rather than hearing the case a second time it remanded for the panel to revise its opinion. See Van Hook v. AndersonSearch
-
April 24, 1996, the provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 do not apply. See Lindh v. MurphySearch
-
U. S. 668 , 686 (1984) (quoting McMann v. RichardsonSearch
-
F. 3d, at 526 (quoting Dickerson v. BagleySearch
-
See Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
F. 3d, at 528. Cf. Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
U. S., at 525, or would have been apparent from documents any reasonable attorney would have obtained, cf. Rompilla v. BeardSearch
-
submitted by the witnesses not interviewed shows their testimony would have added nothing of value. See State v. VanSearch
-
Per Curiam Bobby V. VanSearch
-
Van Hook v. OhioSearch
-
Van Hook v. AndersonSearch
-
Edwards v. ArizonaSearch
-
See Van Hook v. AndersonSearch
-
Van Hook v. HudsonSearch
-
See Lindh v. MurphySearch
-
Dickerson v. BagleySearch
-
Cf. Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
See State v. VanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial