Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Alvarez Vs. Smith

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 08, 2009

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 6 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Preiser Vs. Newkirk US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1975
  2. North Carolina Vs. Rice US Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1971
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. Vs. Haworth US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1937
  4. Mills Vs. Green US Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1895
  5. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. Vs. Icc US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1911
  6. Defunis Vs. Odegaard US Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1974
  7. Syllabus October Term, 2009 Alvarez V. Smith
    Search
  8. and an actual controversy must exist at all stages of review, not just when the complaint is filed, Preiser v. Newkirk
    Search
  9. of the issues and preserves the rights of the parties, while prejudicing none by a preliminary decision. United States v. Munsingwear
    Search
  10. than happenstance, however, the losing party forfeits the equitable remedy of vacatur. U. S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner
    Search
  11. joined as to Parts I and II. Stevens, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. Alvarez v. Smith
    Search
  12. Opinion of the Court Alvarez V. Smith
    Search
  13. S Attorney, Petitioner V. Chermane
    Search
  14. United States v. Von
    Search
  15. the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to that court with instructions to dismiss. United States v. Munsingwear
    Search
  16. Jones v. Takaki
    Search
  17. favor. Smith v. Chicago
    Search
  18. U. S. 395 , 401 (1975) (quoting Steffel v. Thompson
    Search
  19. See, e.g., Lewis v. Continental
    Search
  20. s seizure procedures. See Los Angeles v. Lyons
    Search
  21. See Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. v. Craft
    Search
  22. see also U. S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner
    Search
  23. People v. Smith
    Search
  24. see also Fleming v. Munsingwear
    Search
  25. Court of Appeals and remand the case to that court with instructions to dismiss. It is so ordered. Alvarez v. Smith
    Search
  26. Opinion of Stevens, J. Alvarez V. Smith
    Search
  27. not vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Following the teaching of our decision in U. S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner
    Search
  28. Id., at 24 (quoting United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische
    Search
  29. in turn quoting South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. v. Amador
    Search
  30. Smith v. City
    Search
  31. United States v. Munsingwear
    Search
  32. U. S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner
    Search
  33. Smith v. Chicago
    Search
  34. Steffel v. Thompson
    Search
  35. Lewis v. Continental
    Search
  36. See Los Angeles v. Lyons
    Search
  37. Fleming v. Munsingwear
    Search
  38. United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische
    Search
  39. South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. v. Amador
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales