Citation network
Wright Vs. Van Patten
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 07, 2008
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Wright v. VanSearch
-
Patten - 07-212 (2008) Wright v. VanSearch
-
Patten - 07-212 (2008) Per Curiam Wright V. VanSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Randall Wright, Sheriff, Shawano County, Wisconsin V. JosephSearch
-
s assistance was presumptively ineffective owing to his participation in a plea hearing by speaker phone. Van Patten v. DeppischSearch
-
We granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Carey v. MusladinSearch
-
Van Patten v. EndicottSearch
-
by clear and convincing evidence. See State v. VanSearch
-
A50. Applying Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
a showing of deficient performance and prejudice to the defendant), but under the standard discussed in United States v. CronicSearch
-
test, which we thus far have applied only in cases involving government-sponsored conduct, see , e.g., Estelle v. WilliamsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
id., at 829. We reach the same conclusion. II Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
S. 668 (1984) ordinarily applies to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at the plea hearing stage. See Hill v. LockhartSearch
-
he two-part Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
to result in such poor performance that an inquiry into its effects would not be worth the time. Cf. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSearch
-
It is undisputed that this standard has not been met here. Wright v. VanSearch
-
Patten - 07-212 (2008) Stevens, J., Concurring in Judgment Wright V. VanSearch
-
s opinion in United States v. CronicSearch
-
See also Van Patten v. DeppischSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
through every stage of the proceedings against him. Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 52 , 54 (1961). See also White v. MarylandSearch
-
Van Patten v. DeppischSearch
-
Per Curiam Wright V. VanSearch
-
of Carey v. MusladinSearch
-
See State v. VanSearch
-
Estelle v. WilliamsSearch
-
II Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
See Hill v. LockhartSearch
-
Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Cf. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSearch
-
Stevens, J., Concurring in Judgment Wright V. VanSearch
-
Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
White v. MarylandSearch
-
Bell v. ConeSearch
-
Hamilton v. AlabamaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial