Citation network
Riegel Vs. Medtronic, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 20, 2008
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Riegel v. MedtronicSearch
-
Inc. - 06-179 (2008) Syllabus October Term, 2007 Riegel V. MedtronicSearch
-
s meaning. In Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSearch
-
Cipollone v. LiggettSearch
-
concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Riegel v. MedtronicSearch
-
Inc. - 06-179 (2008) Opinion of the Court Riegel V. MedtronicSearch
-
DONNA S. RIEGEL, individually and as administra- tor of the ESTATE OF CHARLES R. RIEGEL, PETITIONER v. MEDTRONICSearch
-
of new medical devices was left largely for the States to supervise as they saw fit. See Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSearch
-
pre-empted common-law duties. Bates v. DowSearch
-
emphasis added). Cipollone v. LiggettSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
need not be seconded by a committee report on pain of judicial nullification. See, e.g., Connecticut Nat. Bank v. GermainSearch
-
s earlier position was different. See Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
United States v. MeadSearch
-
s reading of its own rule is entitled to substantial deference, see Auer v. RobbinsSearch
-
U. S. 470 , 500 (1996). Riegel v. MedtronicSearch
-
Inc. - 06-179 (2008) Opinion of Stevens, J. Riegel V. MedtronicSearch
-
Oncale v. SundownerSearch
-
regimes that explained the need for a provision pre-empting conflicting administrative rules. See Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSearch
-
See Cipollone v. LiggettSearch
-
Bates v. DowSearch
-
s opinion. Footnote 2 See Cipollone v. LiggettSearch
-
the particular common-law rules at issue in that case satisfied the conditions of pre-emption). Riegel v. MedtronicSearch
-
Inc. - 06-179 (2008) Ginsburg, J., Dissenting Riegel V. MedtronicSearch
-
Rice v. SantaSearch
-
Jones v. RathSearch
-
New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. TravelersSearch
-
Hillsborough County v. AutomatedSearch
-
laws containing a preemption clause do not automatically escape the presumption against preemption. See Bates v. DowSearch
-
for large numbers of consumers injured by defective medical devices. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGeeSearch
-
Cf. Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae on Pet. for Cert. in Smiths Industries Medical Systems, Inc. v. KernatsSearch
-
Geier v. AmericanSearch
-
U. S. 861 , 869 (2000) (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted). See also Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSearch
-
State v. FederalSearch
-
remarks of Sen. Nelson). See also Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSearch
-
An amicus brief interpreting a statute is entitled, at most, to deference under Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
Co. , 323 U. S. 134 (1944). See United States v. MeadSearch
-
it appears, raised no preemption defense to state tort suits involving FDA-approved drugs. See, e.g., Salmon v. ParkeSearch
-
Reyes v. WyethSearch
-
Hoffman v. SterlingSearch
-
Singer v. SterlingSearch
-
McCue v. NorwichSearch
-
Basko v. SterlingSearch
-
Parke-Davis & Co. v. StromsodtSearch
-
In Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Riegel V. MedtronicSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial