Citation network
Preston Vs. Ferrer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 20, 2008
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2007 Preston V. FerrerSearch
-
s appeal was pending, this Court held, in Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSearch
-
when the parties contract for that mode of dispute resolution. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSearch
-
to invalidate an arbitration agreement. In Prima Paint Corp. v. FloodSearch
-
Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSearch
-
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. MercurySearch
-
s reliance on Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. BoardSearch
-
other procedural void for the choice-of-law clause to fill. Second, the Court is guided by its decision in Mastrobuono v. ShearsonSearch
-
Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Preston v. FerrerSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Preston V. FerrerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-1463 Arnold M. Preston, Petitioner V. AlexSearch
-
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. As this Court recognized in Southland Corp. v. KeatingSearch
-
of federal substantive law regarding arbitration. 465 U. S., at 16. More recently, in Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSearch
-
Styne v. StevensSearch
-
s determination becomes final and binding on the parties. REO Broadcasting Consultants v. MartinSearch
-
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. SolerSearch
-
Ferrer points to our holding in EEOC v. WaffleSearch
-
s final attempt to distinguish Buckeye relies on Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. BoardSearch
-
would be governed by California law. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. VoltSearch
-
void for the choice-of-law clause to fill. Second, we are guided by our more recent decision in Mastrobuono v. ShearsonSearch
-
of-law clause contained in the contract, see Brief for Appellant, and Reply Brief, in Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. BoardSearch
-
to overrule Southland , he relies on the same arguments we considered and rejected in Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. DobsonSearch
-
with Brief for Attorney General of Alabama et al. as Amici Curiae in Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. DobsonSearch
-
Marathon Entertainment, Inc. v. BlasiSearch
-
Footnote 8 The question in Mastrobuono was whether the arbitrator could award punitive damages. See Mastrobuono v. ShearsonSearch
-
successfully urged that the agreement to arbitrate in accordance with the NASD rules controlled. Preston v. FerrerSearch
-
et seq. (2000 ed. and Supp. V), does not apply to proceedings in state courts. See Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. DobsonSearch
-
see also Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSearch
-
In Prima Paint Corp. v. FloodSearch
-
Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSearch
-
Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. BoardSearch
-
Mastrobuono v. ShearsonSearch
-
Arnold M. Preston, Petitioner V. AlexSearch
-
REO Broadcasting Consultants v. MartinSearch
-
EEOC v. WaffleSearch
-
Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. VoltSearch
-
See Mastrobuono v. ShearsonSearch
-
See Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. DobsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial