Citation network
Federal Express Corp. Vs. Holowecki
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 27, 2008
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Syllabus October Term, 2007 Federal Express Corp. V. HoloweckiSearch
-
and are therefore entitled to deference under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
under the less deferential standard of Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
Co. , 323 U. S. 134 , see Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPASearch
-
whereby the Court considers whether the agency has consistently applied its position, e.g., United States v. MeadSearch
-
s right to sue upon the agency taking any action. Cf. Edelman v. LynchburgSearch
-
make the definition of charge dependent upon a condition subsequent over which the parties have no control. Cf. Logan v. ZimmermanSearch
-
Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, J., joined. Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Federal Express Corp. V. HoloweckiSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-1322 Federal Express Corporation, Petitioner V. PaulSearch
-
one statute to a different statute without careful and critical examination. Cf. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. ClineSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
interpret ambiguous statutory terms, the courts defer to its reasonable interpretations. See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
s enforcement processes. See, e.g. , Steffen v. MeridianSearch
-
s position, is that all completed Intake Questionnaires are charges. See, e.g. , Casavantes v. CaliforniaSearch
-
entitled to further deference when it adopts a reasonable interpretation of regulations it has put in force. See Auer v. RobbinsSearch
-
Id. , at 461 (quoting Robertson v. MethowSearch
-
the underlying statute. It could be argued, then, that this case can be distinguished from Auer . See Gonzales v. OregonSearch
-
Christensen v. HarrisSearch
-
U. S. 624 , 642 (1998) (quoting Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
under the less deferential Skidmore standard. Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPASearch
-
United States v. MeadSearch
-
was framed for the specific purpose of aiding a party in this litigation. Cf. Bowen v. GeorgetownSearch
-
of enforcing antidiscrimination laws and disseminating information about those laws to the public. Cf. Barnhart v. WaltonSearch
-
Cf. Lopez v. DavisSearch
-
see also Wilkerson v. GrinnellSearch
-
Bihler v. SingerSearch
-
litigation context, pro se litigants are held to a lesser pleading standard than other parties. See Estelle v. GambleSearch
-
EEOC v. CommercialSearch
-
see also Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSearch
-
regard the agency is subject to the oversight of the political branches. Cf. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. BrandSearch
-
Cf. Edelman v. LynchburgSearch
-
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. It is so ordered. Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSearch
-
Thomas, J., Dissenting Federal Express Corp. V. HoloweckiSearch
-
See FDIC v. MeyerSearch
-
and unworthy of deference. See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
s use of a standard that the agency has not adequately explained. Cf . , e.g. , Pearson v. ShalalaSearch
-
Charges are thus typically completed and filed by the agency, not the complainant. See Edelman v. LynchburgSearch
-
See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
Act, 48 Fed. Reg. 138. Five years later, it argued against an intent requirement as amicus curiae in Steffen v. MeridianSearch
-
contradicted itself four years later, when it again took the position that there was no intent requirement in Gordon v. ShaferSearch
-
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
of Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
Cf. Logan v. ZimmermanSearch
-
Federal Express Corporation, Petitioner V. PaulSearch
-
Cf. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. ClineSearch
-
Steffen v. MeridianSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial