Citation network
Snyder Vs. Louisiana
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 19, 2008
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2007 Snyder V. LouisianaSearch
-
The jury convicted petitioner and sentenced him to death. Both on direct appeal and on remand in light of Miller-El v. DretkeSearch
-
s peremptory strikes of certain prospective jurors, including Mr. Brooks, were based on race, in violation of Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
Miller-El , supra, at 277 (Thomas, J., dissenting) (quoting Miller-El v. CockrellSearch
-
Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, J., joined. Snyder v. LouisianaSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Snyder V. LouisianaSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-10119 Allen Snyder, Petitioner V. LouisianaSearch
-
his claim that the prosecution exercised some of its peremptory jury challenges based on race, in violation of Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
State v. TaylorSearch
-
s competency to stand trial. State v. SnyderSearch
-
that petitioner had been competent to stand trial, and the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed that determination. State v. SnyderSearch
-
petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari, and while his petition was pending, this Court decided Miller-El v. DretkeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
remanded the case to the Louisiana Supreme Court for further consideration in light of Miller-El . See Snyder v. LouisianaSearch
-
supra, at 277 (Thomas, J., dissenting) (quoting Miller-El v. CockrellSearch
-
s ruling on the issue of discriminatory intent must be sustained unless it is clearly erroneous. See Hernandez v. NewSearch
-
ibid. (quoting Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
s claim regarding Ms. Scott. See, e.g., United States v. Vasquez-LopezSearch
-
United States v. ClemonsSearch
-
United States v. BattleSearch
-
United States v. DavidSearch
-
F. 2d 1567, 1571 (CA11 1986). In Miller-El v. DretkeSearch
-
Honor Center v. HicksSearch
-
actor, the burden shifts to the party defending the action to show that this factor was not determinative. See Hunter v. UnderwoodSearch
-
Thomas, J., Dissenting Snyder V. LouisianaSearch
-
Hernandez v. NewSearch
-
York , 500 U. S. 352 , 365 (1991) (plurality opinion) (quoting Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
s resolution of a Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
Ibid. (quoting United States v. UnitedSearch
-
United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSearch
-
fact and after extensive intervening litigation, based on arguments not presented to the courts below. Cf. Miller-El v. DretkeSearch
-
of Miller-El v. DretkeSearch
-
of Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
Miller-El v. CockrellSearch
-
Allen Snyder, Petitioner V. LouisianaSearch
-
State v. SnyderSearch
-
See Snyder v. LouisianaSearch
-
See Hernandez v. NewSearch
-
Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
United States v. Vasquez-LopezSearch
-
In Miller-El v. DretkeSearch
-
Honor Center v. HicksSearch
-
See Hunter v. UnderwoodSearch
-
Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Miller-El v. DretkeSearch
-
United States v. LaneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial