Citation network
Baze Vs. Rees
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 16, 2008
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2007 Baze V. ReesSearch
-
a) This Court has upheld capital punishment as constitutional. See Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
the Court has held that an isolated mishap alone does not violate the Eighth Amendment, Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. ResweberSearch
-
s cases, see, e.g., Wilkerson v. UtahSearch
-
opinion concurring in the judgment. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Souter, J., joined. Baze v. ReesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
J. Baze V. ReesSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-5439 Ralph Baze and Thomas C. Bowling, Peti- Tioners V. JohnSearch
-
Campbell v. WoodSearch
-
U. S. 1119 (1994) (Blackmun, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (quoting State v. FramptonSearch
-
New York became the first State to authorize electrocution as a form of capital punishment. Glass v. LouisianaSearch
-
Malloy v. SouthSearch
-
hereinafter Fordham Brief). Following the 9-year hiatus in executions that ended with our decision in Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
least 30 (including Kentucky) use the same combination of three drugs in their lethal injection protocols. See Workman v. BredesenSearch
-
and sentenced to death. The Kentucky Supreme Court upheld their convictions and sentences on direct appeal. See Baze v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Bowling v. CommonwealthSearch
-
to the Constitution, applicable to the States through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Robinson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
chosen procedure for carrying out a sentence of death as the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment. In Wilkerson v. UtahSearch
-
that qualifies as cruel and unusual. In Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. ResweberSearch
-
the States have fulfilled with an earnest desire to provide for a progressively more humane manner of death. See Bell v. WolfishSearch
-
App. 761. We cannot say that this finding is clearly erroneous, see Hernandez v. NewSearch
-
s procedures designed to ensure the delivery of thiopental. See Hamilton v. JonesSearch
-
Taylor v. CrawfordSearch
-
see Brown v. BeckSearch
-
s legitimate interest in carrying out a sentence of death in a timely manner. See Baze v. ParkerSearch
-
Bowling v. ParkerSearch
-
s consensus on lethal injection. Gomez v. UnitedSearch
-
West 2003) (held unconstitutional in People v. LaValleSearch
-
but the Nebraska Supreme Court recently struck down that method under the Nebraska Constitution, see State v. MataSearch
-
the case for capital punishment was stronger when it was imposed predominantly by hanging or electrocution. Baze v. ReesSearch
-
Alito, J., Concurring Baze V. ReesSearch
-
and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) was designed to address this problem. See, e.g. , Woodford v. GarceauSearch
-
citing Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
euthanasia.pdf. Baze v. ReesSearch
-
Stevens, J., Concurring in Judgment Baze V. ReesSearch
-
an issue, rather than a careful analysis of relevant considerations favoring or disfavoring a conclusion. See Mathews v. LucasSearch
-
benefits, and rest in part on a faulty assumption about the retributive force of the death penalty. In Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
such as legislative enactments. See, e.g., Solem v. HelmSearch
-
U. S. 321 (1998). In our recent decision in Atkins v. VirginiaSearch
-
White holding that the death penalty is an excessive punishment for the crime of raping a 16-year-old woman, Coker v. GeorgiaSearch
-
See Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial