Citation network
Riley Vs. Kennedy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 27, 2008
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2007 Riley V. KennedySearch
-
Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
s requests for relief is not final. See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. WetzelSearch
-
on that date. See Young v. FordiceSearch
-
s inquiry. In Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
on the coverage date. Id. , at 395. Similarly, in City of Lockhart v. UnitedSearch
-
ibid . Finally, in Young v. FordiceSearch
-
considerations sometimes require courts to allow elections to proceed despite pending legal challenges. Cf. Purcell v. GonzalezSearch
-
Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Souter, J., joined. Riley v. KennedySearch
-
Opinion of the Court Riley V. KennedySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-77 Bob Riley, Governor of Alabama, Appellant V. YvonneSearch
-
Beer v. UnitedSearch
-
States , 425 U. S. 130 , 141 (1976). See also Young v. FordiceSearch
-
Allen v. StateSearch
-
the court declared the Act unconstitutional. Stokes v. NoonanSearch
-
practice was used in one election only, held in 1987. The next year, the Alabama Supreme Court determined, in Stokes v. NoonanSearch
-
Presley v. EtowahSearch
-
U. S. 254 , 262 (2003). See also Hathorn v. LovornSearch
-
they differ in a critical respect. They do, however, provide the starting point for our inquiry. In Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
Similarly, in City of Lockhart v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S., at 132 (footnote omitted). Finally, in Young v. FordiceSearch
-
elections to proceed based on erroneous interpretations of state law later corrected on appeal. See, e.g., Akins v. SecretarySearch
-
Cobb v. StateSearch
-
Maryland Green Party v. MarylandSearch
-
Callaghan v. StateSearch
-
Peloza v. FreasSearch
-
s decisions in Stokes v. NoonanSearch
-
and Riley v. KennedySearch
-
and the lower courts to consider the question, see, e.g., NAACP, DeKalb Cty. Chapter v. GeorgiaSearch
-
City of Lockhart v. UnitedSearch
-
review by our tightly bounded decision in this case. Riley v. KennedySearch
-
Stevens, J., Dissenting Riley V. KennedySearch
-
s decision in Stokes v. NoonanSearch
-
s Trial Brief in Kennedy v. RileySearch
-
s Supplemental Trial Brief in Kennedy v. RileySearch
-
practice in force or effect. Young v. FordiceSearch
-
in effect immediately prior to the putative change, whether or not that practice violates state law. In Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
The situation was similar in City of Lockhart v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. , at 133. In Young v. FordiceSearch
-
See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. WetzelSearch
-
See Young v. FordiceSearch
-
In Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
Young v. FordiceSearch
-
Cf. Purcell v. GonzalezSearch
-
Bob Riley, Governor of Alabama, Appellant V. YvonneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial