Citation network
Exxon Shipping Co. Vs. Baker
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 2008
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2007 Exxon Shipping Co. V. BakerSearch
-
Neil v. BiggersSearch
-
that result, and the Court has rejected similar attempts to sever remedies from their causes of action, see Silkwood v. Kerr-McGeeSearch
-
in 18th-century English law and became widely accepted in American courts by the mid-19th century. See, e.g., Day v. WoodworthSearch
-
confined by claims that state-court awards violated due process. See, e.g., State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. CampbellSearch
-
scheme ought to threaten defendants with a fair probability of suffering in like degree for like damage. Cf. Koon v. UnitedSearch
-
and dissenting in part. Alito, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Exxon Shipping Co. V. BakerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-219 Exxon Shipping Company, Et Al., Petitioners V. GrantSearch
-
agents under Circuit precedent. See In re Exxon Valdez, 270 F. 3d, at 1236 (citing Protectus Alpha Nav. Co. v. NorthSearch
-
primarily on two cases, The Amiable Nancy , 3 Wheat. 546 (1818), and Lake Shore & Michigan Southern R. Co. v. PrenticeSearch
-
a railway case in which the Court relied on The Amiable Nancy to announce, as a matter of pre- Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
to fall back to a modern-day variant adopted in the context of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in Kolstad v. AmericanSearch
-
Durant v. EssexSearch
-
go without saying that the disposition here is not precedential on the derivative liability question. See, e.g., Neil v. BiggersSearch
-
s accompanying memorandum asserted that two recent cases, Glynn v. RoySearch
-
Al Boat Management Corp., 57 F. 3d 1495 (CA9 1995), and Guevara v. MaritimeSearch
-
Browning-Ferris Industries of Vt., Inc. v. KelcoSearch
-
scheme this way, and we have rejected similar attempts to sever remedies from their causes of action. See Silkwood v. Kerr-McGeeSearch
-
no clear indication of congressional intent to occupy the entire field of pollution remedies, see, e.g., United States v. TexasSearch
-
see, e.g., Edmonds v. CompagnieSearch
-
Romero v. InternationalSearch
-
Wilkes v. WoodSearch
-
Lofft 1, 18, 98 Eng. Rep. 489, 498 (1763) (Lord Chief Justice Pratt). In Wilkes v. WoodSearch
-
s papers, were a spectacular 4,000. See generally Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
States , 116 U. S. 616 , 626 (1886). And in Huckle v. MoneySearch
-
untethered to strict numerical multipliers, and the doctrine promptly crossed the Atlantic, see, e.g., Genay v. NorrisSearch
-
Coryell v. ColbaughSearch
-
N. J. L. 77 (1791), to become widely accepted in American courts by the middle of the 19th century, see, e.g., Day v. WoodworthSearch
-
Tullidge v. WadeSearch
-
Cooper Industries, Inc. v. LeathermanSearch
-
wrongdoing is hard to detect (increasing chances of getting away with it), see, e.g., BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSearch
-
induce private litigation to supplement official enforcement that might fall short if unaided. See, e.g., Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
bars punitive damages entirely, on state constitutional grounds. See, e.g., Distinctive Printing and Packaging Co. v. CoxSearch
-
and Washington as a matter of common law, and New Hampshire by statute codifying common law tradition. See Ross v. ConocoSearch
-
Flesner v. TechnicalSearch
-
Fisher Properties v. Arden-MayfairSearch
-
see also Fay v. ParkerSearch
-
Michigan courts recognize only exemplary damages supportable as compensatory, rather than truly punitive, see Peisner v. DetroitSearch
-
Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSearch
-
Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaslipSearch
-
see also Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSearch
-
and conduct for which punitive damages are expressly authorized by statute. Rookes v. BarnardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial