Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Scott Vs. Harris

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 30, 2007

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 7 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Diebold US Supreme Court · May 14, 1962
  2. Graham Vs. Connor US Supreme Court · May 15, 1989
  3. United States Vs. Place US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1983
  4. Mitchell Vs. Forsyth US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1985
  5. Hunter Vs. Bryant US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1817
  6. Brosseau Vs. Haugen US Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2004
  7. County of Sacramento Vs. Lewis US Supreme Court · Dec 09, 1997
  8. Syllabus October Term, 2006 Scott V. Harris
    Search
  9. under Tennessee v. Garner
    Search
  10. Saucier v. Katz
    Search
  11. interests against the importance of the governmental interests allegedly justifying the intrusion. United States v. Place
    Search
  12. joined. Ginsburg, J., and Breyer, J., filed concurring opinions. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Scott v. Harris
    Search
  13. Opinion of the Court Scott V. Harris
    Search
  14. Supreme Court of the United States No. 05-1631 Timothy Scott, Petitioner V. Victor
    Search
  15. Harris v. Coweta
    Search
  16. United States v. Treasury
    Search
  17. Employees , 513 U. S. 454 , 478 (1995) (citing Ashwander v. TVA
    Search
  18. Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. Zenith
    Search
  19. Anderson v. Liberty
    Search
  20. Brower v. County
    Search
  21. s car and shooting the motorist, cf. Vaughan v. Cox
    Search
  22. Bunting v. Mellen
    Search
  23. id. , at 1025 (Scalia, J., joined by Rehnquist, C.J., dissenting). See also Lyons v. Xenia
    Search
  24. Ibid . Footnote 10 The Court of Appeals cites Brower v. County
    Search
  25. s factual assumption that the high-speed flight would have ended. Scott v. Harris
    Search
  26. urging the Court to overrule Saucier v. Katz
    Search
  27. Saucier , therefore, is properly reserved for another day and case. See ante , at 4, n. 4. Scott v. Harris
    Search
  28. Breyer, J., Concurring Scott V. Harris
    Search
  29. And that fact-dependency supports the argument that we should overrule the requirement, announced in Saucier v. Katz
    Search
  30. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlin
    Search
  31. see Ashwander v. TVA
    Search
  32. Dirrane v. Brookline
    Search
  33. Lyons v. Xenia
    Search
  34. be reluctant to overturn precedents, stare decisis concerns are at their weakest here. See, e.g. , Payne v. Tennessee
    Search
  35. s opinion. Scott v. Harris
    Search
  36. Stevens, J., Dissenting Scott V. Harris
    Search
  37. deadly force in this case was no more appropriate than the use of a deadly weapon against a fleeing felon in Tennessee v. Garner
    Search
  38. approach applied in Garner and Graham v. Connor
    Search
  39. Tennessee v. Garner
    Search
  40. Timothy Scott, Petitioner V. Victor
    Search
  41. Ashwander v. TVA
    Search
  42. Vaughan v. Cox
    Search
  43. Payne v. Tennessee
    Search
  44. Garner and Graham v. Connor
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial