Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Roper Vs. Weaver

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 21, 2007

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 3 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Massachusetts Vs. Epa US Supreme Court · Apr 02, 2007
  2. Fay Vs. Noia US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  3. Woodford Vs. Garceau US Supreme Court · Mar 25, 2003
  4. Per Curiam Roper V. Weaver
    Search
  5. Supreme Court of the United States Don Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Petitioner V. William
    Search
  6. Weaver v. Bowersox
    Search
  7. Death Penalty Act of 1996, (AEDPA), 110 Stat. 1214, was consistent with our interpretation of that statute. Cf. Carey v. Musladin
    Search
  8. s codefendant. See Shurn v. Delo
    Search
  9. Newlon v. Armontrout
    Search
  10. s strict standard of review. See Weaver v. Bowersox
    Search
  11. F. 3d 1024, 1029 (2001). Our recent decision in Lawrence v. Florida
    Search
  12. citing Fay v. Noia
    Search
  13. the denial of the certificate of appealability. Pursuit of either would almost certainly have been futile. Roper v. Weaver
    Search
  14. Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-313 Don Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Petitioner V. William
    Search
  15. decision to dismiss the writ as improvidently granted in this case, I do agree with that disposition. Roper v. Weaver
    Search
  16. Scalia, J., Dissenting Roper V. Weaver
    Search
  17. s capital trial did not rise to the level of a due process violation. Weaver v. Bowersox
    Search
  18. s error was not clear until our recent decision in Lawrence v. Florida
    Search
  19. s error was as apparent in 1996 as it was in 1966 . In Fay v. Noia
    Search
  20. s effective date, see Woodford v. Garceau
    Search
  21. law would entitle him to relief from the collateral consequences of an uncorrected judicial error. We held in Daniels v. United
    Search
  22. s error. He made no such claim either time he was before the Eighth Circuit. See Brief for Appellee in Bowersox v. Weaver
    Search
  23. Cross-Appellant in Bowersox v. Weaver
    Search
  24. Cf. Carey v. Musladin
    Search
  25. See Shurn v. Delo
    Search
  26. See Weaver v. Bowersox
    Search
  27. Lawrence v. Florida
    Search
  28. Don Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Petitioner V. William
    Search
  29. In Fay v. Noia
    Search
  30. Daniels v. United
    Search
  31. Bowersox v. Weaver
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial