Citation network
Uttecht Vs. Brown
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 04, 2007
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2006 Uttecht V. BrownSearch
-
s habeas petition, but the Ninth Circuit reversed, finding that under Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Courts reviewing claims of error under Witherspoon and Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Souter, J., joined. Uttecht v. BrownSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Uttecht V. BrownSearch
-
Of the United States No. 06-413 Jeffrey Uttecht, Superintendent, Wash- Ington State Penitentiary, Petitioner V. CalSearch
-
sentenced to death. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. State v. BrownSearch
-
but the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. Brown v. LambertSearch
-
considered, among other arguments for setting aside the capital sentence, the contention that under Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
see also Brief for Petitioner in Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
n. 21. In Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
s interest in administering its capital punishment scheme called for a different standard. The Court relied on Adams v. TexasSearch
-
Id. , at 434. The rule of deference was reinforced in Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
it had prior to excusing other jurors, supported the conclusion that the juror was impaired. Ibid. In Gray v. MississippiSearch
-
Darden , supra, at 178. Leading treatises in the area make much of nonverbal communication. See, e.g., V. StarrSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
Witt rule that a state appellate court make particular reference to the excusal of each juror. See Early v. PackerSearch
-
State v. TaylorSearch
-
TO OPINION OF THE COURT Excerpts of Verbatim Report of Proceedings (Voir Dire) (Nov. 3, 1993) in State v. BrownSearch
-
Stevens, J., Dissenting Uttecht V. BrownSearch
-
s peremptory challenge, until today not one of the many cases decided in the wake of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
As then-Justice Rehnquist explained in his opinion for the Court in Lockhart v. McCreeSearch
-
crossed to establish the kind of impairment that would justify the exclusion of a juror under the rule of Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
s opinion for the Court in Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
State v. BrownSearch
-
see also State v. LevySearch
-
quoting State v. BeckerSearch
-
without hesitation that he would be able to vote for a death sentence under any imaginable circumstance. Cf. Adams v. TexasSearch
-
with regard to their inability to follow the law or to impose the death penalty. See, e.g. , Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Cf. Gray v. MississippiSearch
-
Brown v. LambertSearch
-
Id., at 431, n. 11. Uttecht v. BrownSearch
-
State v. LevySearch
-
Witherspoon and Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Jeffrey Uttecht, Superintendent, Wash- Ington State Penitentiary, Petitioner V. CalSearch
-
the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. State v. BrownSearch
-
In Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Adams v. TexasSearch
-
Ibid. In Gray v. MississippiSearch
-
See Early v. PackerSearch
-
of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
of Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
State v. BeckerSearch
-
Cf. Adams v. TexasSearch
-
Darden v. WainwrightSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial