Citation network
Morse Vs. Frederick
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 2007
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2006 Morse V. FrederickSearch
-
student speech at a school event, when that speech is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use. In Tinker v. DesSearch
-
id., at 513. The Court in Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. FraserSearch
-
dissenting in part. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Souter and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Morse v. FrederickSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Morse V. FrederickSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-278 Deborah Morse, Et Al., Petitioners V. JosephSearch
-
Tinker v. DesSearch
-
Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. FraserSearch
-
Hazelwood School Dist. v. KuhlmeierSearch
-
There is some uncertainty at the outer boundaries as to when courts should apply school-speech precedents, see Porter v. AscensionSearch
-
between celebrating illegal drug use in the midst of fellow students and outright advocacy or promotion. See Guiles v. MarineauSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Fraser delivered the same speech in a public forum outside the school context, it would have been protected. See Cohen v. CaliforniaSearch
-
inadequate to decide the case before us. Qualified immunity shields public officials from money damages only. See Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
s effort to find inconsistency between our approach here and the opinion in Federal Election Commission v. WisconsinSearch
-
s banner is political speech of the sort at issue in Wisconsin Right to Life . Morse v. FrederickSearch
-
Thomas, J., Concurring Morse V. FrederickSearch
-
and therefore join its opinion in full. I write separately to state my view that the standard set forth in Tinker v. DesSearch
-
Chaplinsky v. NewSearch
-
see also Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
State v. PendergrassSearch
-
of school administration, allowing schools and teachers to set and enforce rules and to maintain order. Sheehan v. SturgesSearch
-
Patterson v. NutterSearch
-
in front of other students. Lander v. SeaverSearch
-
Wooster v. SunderlandSearch
-
Deskins v. GoseSearch
-
Vanvactor v. StateSearch
-
was wholly discretionary as long as the teacher did not act with legal malice or cause permanent injury. E.g., Boyd v. StateSearch
-
Gardner v. StateSearch
-
Anderson v. StateSearch
-
Hardy v. JamesSearch
-
s standard, or rather set the standard aside on an ad hoc basis. In Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. FraserSearch
-
U. S., at 683. Similarly, in Hazelwood School Dist. v. KuhlmeierSearch
-
schools to allow all student speech. Parents decide whether to send their children to public schools. Cf. Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
s age. See, e.g., Stevens v. FassettSearch
-
State v. MiznerSearch
-
Sheehan v. SturgesSearch
-
favor the broad discretion given to teachers to impose corporal punishment recognized that the law provided it. Cooper v. McJunkinSearch
-
upheld punishment when children refused to speak after being requested to do so by their teachers. See Board of Ed. v. HelstonSearch
-
cf. Sewell v. BoardSearch
-
to recognize the applicability of the in loco parentis doctrine to public schools. See Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. ActonSearch
-
the cases the Court cited in favor of that bold proposition do not support it. Tinker chiefly relies upon Meyer v. NebraskaSearch
-
rights apply within schools operated by the State. And notably, Meyer relied as its chief support on the Lochner v. NewSearch
-
line of cases, 262 U. S., at 399, a line of cases that has long been criticized, United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. Oneida-HerkimerSearch
-
Tinker also relied on Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
In Tinker v. DesSearch
-
Petitioners V. JosephSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial