Citation network
Wilkie Vs. Robbins
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 2007
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2006 Wilkie V. RobbinsSearch
-
Act (RICO) claim that defendants repeatedly tried to extort an easement from him and a similarly grounded Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to a convincing reason for the Judicial Branch to refrain from providing a new and freestanding damages remedy. Bush v. LucasSearch
-
Wabaunsee Cty. v. UmbehrSearch
-
which Congress is presumed to have incorporated into the Act in 1946, see, e.g., Scheidler v. NationalSearch
-
Evans v. UnitedSearch
-
s exclusive benefit. United States v. GreenSearch
-
Ginsburg, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Stevens, J., joined. Wilkie v. RobbinsSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Wilkie V. RobbinsSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-219 Charles Wilkie, Et Al., Petitioners V. HarveySearch
-
The questions here are whether the landowner has either a private action for damages of the sort recognized in Bivens v. SixSearch
-
up to one year in prison. A jury acquitted Robbins in December, after deliberating less than 30 minutes. United States v. RobbinsSearch
-
lands. Robbins appealed to the IBLA, which stayed the revocation pending resolution of the appeal. Order in Robbins v. BureauSearch
-
court, but a district court denied relief in a decision affirmed by the Court of Appeals in February 2006. Robbins v. BureauSearch
-
to consider an interlocutory appeal of the denial of qualified immunity, 433 F. 3d 755, 761 (2006) (citing Mitchell v. ForsythSearch
-
nonstatutory damages remedies, the first for employment discrimination in violation of the Due Process Clause, Davis v. PassmanSearch
-
U. S. 228 (1979), and the second for an Eighth Amendment violation by prison officials, Carlson v. GreenSearch
-
held against applying the Bivens model to claims of First Amendment violations by federal employers, Bush v. LucasSearch
-
U. S. 367 (1983), harm to military personnel through activity incident to service, United States v. StanleySearch
-
U. S. 296 (1983), and wrongful denials of Social Security disability benefits, Schweiker v. ChilickySearch
-
U. S. 412 (1988). We have seen no case for extending Bivens to claims against federal agencies, FDIC v. MeyerSearch
-
U. S. 471 (1994), or against private prisons, Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSearch
-
prosecution, though it is also possible that a remedy would have been unavailable against federal officials, see Blake v. RupeSearch
-
recognition that the Government may not retaliate for exercising First Amendment speech rights, see Rankin v. McPhersonSearch
-
U. S. 378 (1987), or certain others of constitutional rank, see, e.g. , Lefkowitz v. TurleySearch
-
United States v. JacksonSearch
-
retaliation cases but on claims of discrimination based on race or other characteristics. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
cf. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
which we presume Congress meant to incorporate when it passed the Hobbs Act in 1946. See Scheidler v. NationalSearch
-
see also Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
extortion under color of official right undertaken for the sole benefit of the Government. See, e.g. , McCormick v. UnitedSearch
-
cf. United States v. DeaverSearch
-
People v. WhaleySearch
-
Cow. 661 (N. Y. 1827), and Willett v. DevoySearch
-
Robbins states. There is a reason he is plumbing obscurity. Robbins points to what we said in United States v. GreenSearch
-
other agency, to extortion charges whenever they stretch in trying to enforce Government property claims. See Sinclair v. HawkeSearch
-
accord, United States v. NardelloSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial