Citation network
Kimbrough Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 10, 2007
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Kimbrough v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 06-6330 (2007) Syllabus October Term, 2007 Kimbrough V. UnitedSearch
-
Under United States v. BookerSearch
-
within these brackets, and this Court declines to read any implicit directive into the congressional silence. See Jama v. ImmigrationSearch
-
h). This cautious reading of the 1986 Act draws force from Neal v. UnitedSearch
-
Rita v. UnitedSearch
-
Gall v. UnitedSearch
-
joined. Scalia, J., filed a concurring opinion. Thomas, J., and Alito, J., filed dissenting opinions. Kimbrough v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 06-6330 (2007) Opinion of the Court Kimbrough V. UnitedSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-6330 Derrick Kimbrough, Petitioner V. UnitedSearch
-
s remedial opinion in United States v. BookerSearch
-
Fed. Appx., at 799 (citing United States v. EuraSearch
-
ratio in mind, we next consider the status of the Guidelines tied to the ratio after our decision in United States v. BookerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Ibid. In sum, while the statute still requires a court to give respectful consideration to the Guidelines, see Gall v. UnitedSearch
-
cf. Rita v. UnitedSearch
-
within these brackets, and we decline to read any implicit directive into that congressional silence. See Jama v. ImmigrationSearch
-
for specified categories of offenders.). Our cautious reading of the 1986 Act draws force from Neal v. UnitedSearch
-
paper) on which LSD is absorbed even though the carrier is usually far heavier than the LSD itself. See Chapman v. UnitedSearch
-
amendment. Ordinarily, we resist reading congressional intent into congressional inaction. See Bob Jones Univ. v. UnitedSearch
-
powder ratio itself. IV While rendering the Sentencing Guidelines advisory, United States v. BookerSearch
-
at 11. Congress established the Commission to formulate and constantly refine national sentencing standards. See Rita v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. PruittSearch
-
even in a mine-run case. Ibid. Cf. Tr. of Oral Arg. in Gall v. UnitedSearch
-
s purposes, even in a mine-run case. v. TakingSearch
-
c)(1)(A). Footnote 2 Kimbrough was sentenced in April 2005, three months after our decision in Booker v. UnitedSearch
-
to be served consecutively. Footnote 4 This question has divided the Courts of Appeals. Compare United States v. PickettSearch
-
powder disparity in imposing a sentence), and United States v. GunterSearch
-
CA3 2006) (same), with United States v. LeatchSearch
-
powder disparity), United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
F. 3d 515, 522 (CA8 2007) (same), United States v. CastilloSearch
-
F. 3d 337, 361 (CA2 2006) (same), United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
F. 3d 1353, 1369 (CA11 2006) (same), United States v. MillerSearch
-
CA7 2006) (same), United States v. EuraSearch
-
CA4 2006) (same), and United States v. PhoSearch
-
a) factors. Footnote 14 At oral argument, the Government sought to distinguish Neal v. UnitedSearch
-
embodied in the 1986 Act, even if the deviation produces some inconsistency. See Brief for United States in Neal v. UnitedSearch
-
at or only two levels above those that correspond to the statutory minimums. See 2007 Report 25. Kimbrough v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 06-6330 (2007) Scalia, J., Concurring Kimbrough V. UnitedSearch
-
Ante, at 21 (quoting Rita v. UnitedSearch
-
found by judge rather than jury. This, as we said in Booker, would violate the Sixth Amendment. Kimbrough v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 06-6330 (2007) Thomas, J., Dissenting Kimbrough V. UnitedSearch
-
Justice Thomas, dissenting. I continue to disagree with the remedy fashioned in United States v. BookerSearch
-
See Jama v. ImmigrationSearch
-
Neal v. UnitedSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Kimbrough V. UnitedSearch
-
Derrick Kimbrough, Petitioner V. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. EuraSearch
-
See Chapman v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial