Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Watson Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 10, 2007

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

48 entries 4 linked 44 unlinked
Show
  1. Asgrow Seed Co. Vs. Winterboer US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1995
  2. Fdic Vs. Meyer US Supreme Court · Oct 04, 1993
  3. Lopez Vs. Gonzales US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 2006
  4. United States Vs. Cox US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1837
  5. Watson v. United
    Search
  6. States - 06-571 (2007) Syllabus October Term, 2007 Watson V. United
    Search
  7. Smith v. United
    Search
  8. c)(1), the Court, in Bailey v. United
    Search
  9. Thomas, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Watson v. United
    Search
  10. States - 06-571 (2007) Opinion of the Court Watson V. United
    Search
  11. Supreme Court of the United States No. 06-571 Michael a. Watson, Petitioner V. United
    Search
  12. undefined, though we have spoken to it twice before. Smith v. United
    Search
  13. id., at 230. Two years later, the issue in Bailey v. United
    Search
  14. a firearm, see id., at 327 (citing United States v. Ulloa
    Search
  15. F. 3d 949 (CA5 1996) and United States v. Zuniga
    Search
  16. has to turn on the language as we normally speak it, see, e.g., Lopez v. Gonzales
    Search
  17. never guess which way this commerce actually flowed from hearing that the boy used the granola. Cf. United States v. Stewart
    Search
  18. United States v. Westmoreland
    Search
  19. Gustafson v. Alloyd
    Search
  20. Powerex Corp. v. Reliant
    Search
  21. Patterson v. McLean
    Search
  22. we accord to our interpretations of statutes, Shepard v. United
    Search
  23. cf. United States v. Cox
    Search
  24. s house, but not the pistol he got for the narcotics. Footnote 5 Compare United States v. Cotto
    Search
  25. United States v. Sumler
    Search
  26. United States v. Ramirez-Rangel
    Search
  27. United States v. Ulloa
    Search
  28. United States v. Cannon
    Search
  29. F. 3d 1495 (CA8 1996) (same), with United States v. Montano
    Search
  30. United States v. Stewart
    Search
  31. United States v. Warwick
    Search
  32. a firearm where he gave cocaine base to a compatriot in exchange for assistance in obtaining a gun. See United States v. Harris
    Search
  33. that the receipt of a firearm in exchange for drugs constitutes use of the firearm. See, e.g., United States v. Belcher
    Search
  34. c)(1)(A) and 924(d)(1) would upend Bailey v. United
    Search
  35. U. S., at 143. Watson v. United
    Search
  36. s judgment, however, because I am persuaded that the Court took a wrong turn in Smith v. United
    Search
  37. overrule Smith , and thereby render our precedent both coherent and consistent with normal usage. Cf. Henslee v. Union
    Search
  38. Bailey v. United
    Search
  39. Opinion of the Court Watson V. United
    Search
  40. Michael a. Watson, Petitioner V. United
    Search
  41. and United States v. Zuniga
    Search
  42. Cf. United States v. Stewart
    Search
  43. Shepard v. United
    Search
  44. Compare United States v. Cotto
    Search
  45. United States v. Montano
    Search
  46. See United States v. Harris
    Search
  47. United States v. Belcher
    Search
  48. Cf. Henslee v. Union
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial