Citation network
Will Vs. Hallock
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 18, 2006
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2005 Will V. HallockSearch
-
the search. While that suit was pending, Susan also filed this action against the individual agents under Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Digital Equipment Corp. v. DesktopSearch
-
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. MetcalfSearch
-
of orders this Court has held to be collaterally appealable are those rejecting absolute immunity, Nixon v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
U. S. 731 , 742, qualified immunity, Mitchell v. ForsythSearch
-
of a trial, but avoidance of a trial that would imperil a substantial public interest that counts. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
F. 3d 147, vacated and remanded. Souter, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Will v. HallockSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Will V. HallockSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 04-1332 Richard Will, Et Al., Petitioners V. SusanSearch
-
e). Hallock v. UnitedSearch
-
against the Government was still pending, Susan Hallock filed this action against the individual agents under Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
under the Tort Claims Act was solely on a procedural ground, and thus failed to raise the judgment bar. Hallock v. BonnerSearch
-
Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, after first finding jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine. Hallock v. BonnerSearch
-
jurisdiction on the part of the Court of Appeals. II The collateral order doctrine, identified with Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
that are not directly appealable to us, Behrens v. PelletierSearch
-
Eddy, Inc., 506 U. S. 139 , 144 (1993) (quoting Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
Digital Equipment, supra, at 868 (citing Midland Asphalt Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSearch
-
U. S. 368 , 374 (1981) (quoting Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
within the class and those outside. On the immediately appealable side are orders rejecting absolute immunity, Nixon v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
U. S. 731 , 742 (1982), and qualified immunity, Mitchell v. ForsythSearch
-
and a criminal defendant may collaterally appeal an adverse ruling on a defense of double jeopardy, Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
citing Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSearch
-
U. S. 517 , 524 (1988)). See also Lauro Lines s.r.l. v. ChasserSearch
-
see also Saucier v. KatzSearch
-
free of double jeopardy is subject to an analogous condition, that jeopardy have attached in a prior proceeding, Monge v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Mitchell v. ForsythSearch
-
Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
Court. Will v. HallockSearch
-
Petitioners V. SusanSearch
-
Hallock v. UnitedSearch
-
Hallock v. BonnerSearch
-
Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Midland Asphalt Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSearch
-
Saucier v. KatzSearch
-
Monge v. CaliforniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial