Citation network
Lance Vs. Dennis
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 21, 2006
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Per Curiam Lance V. DennisSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Keith Lance, Et Al., Appellants V. GigiSearch
-
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. SaudiSearch
-
redistricting after the 2000 census, under which the State gained a seat in the House of Representatives. Lance v. DavidsonSearch
-
state courts to create a plan. The courts agreed, drawing a new map reflecting the additional district. See Beauprez v. AvalosSearch
-
Salazar v. DavidsonSearch
-
federal-law claims. See Keller v. DavidsonSearch
-
a losing party in Salazar. Relying on our decisions in Washington v. WashingtonSearch
-
State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn., 443 U. S. 658 (1979), and Tacoma v. TaxpayersSearch
-
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
see also Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. LocomotiveSearch
-
Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
Verizon Md. Inc. v. PublicSearch
-
see Karcher v. MaySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
who were in privity with a party to the earlier state-court action. 379 F. Supp. 2d, at 1123 (citing Kenmen Eng. v. UnionSearch
-
Baker v. GeneralSearch
-
Motors Corp., 522 U. S. 222 , 246 (1998) (quoting Kremer v. ChemicalSearch
-
Feldman because they were in privity with the secretary of state, the other losing party in People ex rel. Salazar v. DavidsonSearch
-
Petition Clause claim. Lance v. DennisSearch
-
opinion), that question of Colorado law seems to me best left for full airing and decision on remand. Lance v. DennisSearch
-
Stevens, J., Dissenting Lance V. DennisSearch
-
legal proposition that only this Court may exercise appellate jurisdiction over state-court judgments. See Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
s lucid opinion in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. SaudiSearch
-
to hear this matter, its judgment dismissing the cause with prejudice was correct and should be affirmed. See Lance v. DavidsonSearch
-
as that advanced by their official representatives and decided by the Colorado Supreme Court in People ex rel. Salazar v. DavidsonSearch
-
of Colorado, and the Colorado General Assembly, which was also a party to the Salazar litigation. See McNichols v. CitySearch
-
Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. BoardSearch
-
Michaelson v. MichaelsonSearch
-
nothing in the United States Constitution guarantees that such a petition will be effective, Smith v. HighwaySearch
-
see also Minnesota State Bd. for Community Colleges v. KnightSearch
-
s Decision in Johnson v. RodriguesSearch
-
Bates v. JonesSearch
-
s Decision in Van Harken v. CitySearch
-
Casenote, Texaco, Inc. v. PennzoilSearch
-
Comment, Texaco, Inc. v. PennzoilSearch
-
Appellants V. GigiSearch
-
the House of Representatives. Lance v. DavidsonSearch
-
See Beauprez v. AvalosSearch
-
Salazar v. DavidsonSearch
-
See Keller v. DavidsonSearch
-
Washington v. WashingtonSearch
-
and Tacoma v. TaxpayersSearch
-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. LocomotiveSearch
-
Kenmen Eng. v. UnionSearch
-
Kremer v. ChemicalSearch
-
See Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
See Lance v. DavidsonSearch
-
See McNichols v. CitySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial