Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Texaco Inc. Vs. Dagher

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 28, 2006

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 1 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. State Oil Co. Vs. Khan US Supreme Court · Oct 07, 1997
  2. Syllabus October Term, 2005 Texaco Inc. V. Dagher
    Search
  3. of the Sherman Act, see, e.g. , Catalano, Inc. v. Target
    Search
  4. recognizing, instead, that Congress intended to outlaw only unreasonable restraints, e.g. , State Oil Co. v. Khan
    Search
  5. agreements. National Soc. of Professional Engineers v. United
    Search
  6. and opportunities for profit, they are regarded as a single firm competing with other sellers in the market. Arizona v. Maricopa
    Search
  7. Shell Oil Co. v. Dagher
    Search
  8. et al., also on certiorari to the same court. Texaco Inc. v. Dagher
    Search
  9. Opinion of the Court Texaco Inc. V. Dagher
    Search
  10. See, e.g. , Catalano, Inc. v. Target
    Search
  11. and rejecting that request. Dagher v. Saudi
    Search
  12. This Court has not taken a literal approach to this language, however. See, e.g. , State Oil Co. v. Khan
    Search
  13. National Soc. of Professional Engineers v. United
    Search
  14. State Oil , supra , at 10 (quoting FTC v. Indiana
    Search
  15. Arizona v. Maricopa
    Search
  16. may be price fixing in a literal sense, it is not price fixing in the antitrust sense. See Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia
    Search
  17. business association or joint venture, on nonventure activities. See, e.g. , National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Board
    Search
  18. Citizen Publishing Co. v. United
    Search
  19. would have been required to show that its creation was anticompetitive under the rule of reason. See Copperweld Corp. v. Independence
    Search
  20. that courts need undertake only a cursory examination before imposing antitrust liability. See California Dental Assn. v. FTC
    Search
  21. Catalano, Inc. v. Target
    Search
  22. Dagher v. Saudi
    Search
  23. FTC v. Indiana
    Search
  24. See Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia
    Search
  25. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Board
    Search
  26. See Copperweld Corp. v. Independence
    Search
  27. See California Dental Assn. v. FTC
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial