Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Scheidler Vs. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 28, 2006

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 4 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Enmons US Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1973
  2. Allied-bruce Terminix Cos. Vs. Dobson US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1995
  3. United States Vs. Culbert US Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1978
  4. Montclair Vs. Ramsdell US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 1883
  5. Scheidler v. National
    Search
  6. Organization for Women, Inc. - 04-1244 (2006) Syllabus October Term, 2005 Scheidler V. National
    Search
  7. s civil provisions, the Hobbs Act, and other extortion-related laws. In Scheidler v. National
    Search
  8. constitutional provision (here, the Commerce Clause) granting that authority. See, e.g., Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson
    Search
  9. of federal law. Cf. Jones v. United
    Search
  10. Morissette v. United
    Search
  11. the revision worked a change in the underlying substantive law absent a clearly expressed intent to do so. Keene Corp. v. United
    Search
  12. Operation Rescue v. National
    Search
  13. Organization for Women, Inc., et al., also on certiorari to the same court. Scheidler v. National
    Search
  14. Organization for Women, Inc. - 04-1244 (2006) Opinion of the Court Scheidler V. National
    Search
  15. a purpose that is lacking here. National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler
    Search
  16. ND Ill. 1991). The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed. National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler
    Search
  17. reversed the Court of Appeals and remanded the case for further proceedings. National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler
    Search
  18. a), (c). The Court of Appeals affirmed. 267 F. 3d 687 (2001). This Court again reversed. Scheidler v. National
    Search
  19. provision (here, the Commerce Clause) that grants Congress that authority. See Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson
    Search
  20. Russell v. United
    Search
  21. see United States v. Culbert
    Search
  22. Keene Corp. v. United
    Search
  23. quoting Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra
    Search
  24. construction of the Act. See United States v. Yankowski
    Search
  25. United States v. Franks
    Search
  26. that give a function to each word in a statute, thereby avoiding linguistic superfluity. See United States v. Menasche
    Search
  27. quoting Montclair v. Ramsdell
    Search
  28. determine what Congress intended, not to lead courts to interpret the law contrary to that intent. Chickasaw Nation v. United
    Search
  29. In Scheidler v. National
    Search
  30. Cf. Jones v. United
    Search
  31. Opinion of the Court Scheidler V. National
    Search
  32. Women, Inc. v. Scheidler
    Search
  33. See Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson
    Search
  34. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra
    Search
  35. of the Act. See United States v. Yankowski
    Search
  36. See United States v. Menasche
    Search
  37. Chickasaw Nation v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial