Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Zedner Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 05, 2006

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 6 linked 21 unlinked
Show
  1. Davis Vs. Wakelee US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1895
  2. Pegram Vs. Herdrich US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 2000
  3. Connecticut Nat. Bank Vs. Germain US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1992
  4. United States Vs. Vonn US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 2002
  5. Conroy Vs. Aniskoff US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1993
  6. United States Vs. Gonzales US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1996
  7. Zedner v. United
    Search
  8. States - 05-5992 (2006) Syllabus October Term, 2005 Zedner V. United
    Search
  9. Neder v. United
    Search
  10. Scalia, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Zedner v. United
    Search
  11. States - 05-5992 (2006) Opinion of the Court Zedner V. United
    Search
  12. Supreme Court of the United States No. 05-5992 Jacob Zedner, Petitioner V. United
    Search
  13. quoting United States v. Gambino
    Search
  14. to find an implied repeal of Rule 52, United States v. Vonn
    Search
  15. s categorical terms. See Alabama v. Bozeman
    Search
  16. Footnote 2 The Court of Appeals ultimately remanded the case for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker
    Search
  17. Footnote 4 We left this question open in New York v. Hill
    Search
  18. a district court to put its findings on the record at or near the time when it grants the continuance. Zedner v. United
    Search
  19. adopted in a fashion that entitles it to our attention, is the text of the enacted statute. See, e.g., Conroy v. Aniskoff
    Search
  20. that when the language of the statute is plain, legislative history is irrelevant. See, e.g., United States v. Gonzales
    Search
  21. Opinion of the Court Zedner V. United
    Search
  22. Jacob Zedner, Petitioner V. United
    Search
  23. United States v. Gambino
    Search
  24. See Alabama v. Bozeman
    Search
  25. of United States v. Booker
    Search
  26. New York v. Hill
    Search
  27. New Hampshire v. Maine
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial