Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Muehler Vs. Mena

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 22, 2005

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

57 entries 6 linked 51 unlinked
Show
  1. Florida Vs. Bostick US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1991
  2. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. Vs. Smith US Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1999
  3. Pierce County Vs. Guillen US Supreme Court · Nov 04, 2002
  4. ins Vs. Delgado US Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1984
  5. United States Vs. Brignoni-ponce US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1975
  6. Graham Vs. Connor US Supreme Court · May 15, 1989
  7. Syllabus October Term, 2004 Muehler V. Mena
    Search
  8. Supreme Court of the United States Muehler Et Al. V. Mena
    Search
  9. Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  10. authorization to detain is the authority to use reasonable force to effectuate the detention. See Graham v. Connor
    Search
  11. Moreover, the need to detain multiple occupants made the use of handcuffs all the more reasonable. Cf. Maryland v. Wilson
    Search
  12. s immigration status was required. Cf. Illinois v. Caballes
    Search
  13. the police completed the tasks incident to the search, this Court declines to address it. See, e.g., Pierce County v. Guillen
    Search
  14. J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Muehler v. Mena
    Search
  15. Opinion of the Court Muehler V. Mena
    Search
  16. Supreme Court of the United States No. 03-1423 Darin L. Muehler, Et Al., Petitioners V. Iris
    Search
  17. of Mena about her immigration status during the detention constituted an independent Fourth Amendment violation. Mena v. Simi
    Search
  18. on this claim the Court of Appeals held that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity. Mena v. Simi
    Search
  19. In Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  20. occupant of the place to be searched is the authority to use reasonable force to effectuate the detention. See Graham v. Connor
    Search
  21. Maryland v. Wilson
    Search
  22. of handcuffs, the need to detain multiple occupants made the use of handcuffs all the more reasonable. Cf. Maryland v. Wilson
    Search
  23. see also INS v. Delgado
    Search
  24. to ask Mena for her name, date and place of birth, or immigration status. Our recent opinion in Illinois v. Caballes
    Search
  25. search. Because the Court of Appeals did not address this contention, we too decline to address it. See Pierce County v. Guillen
    Search
  26. occurred we draw all reasonable factual inferences in favor of the jury verdict, but as we made clear in Ornelas v. United
    Search
  27. the Court of Appeals improperly relied upon the fact that the warrant did not include Mena as a suspect. See Mena v. Simi
    Search
  28. weapons and evidence of street gang membership. In this respect, the warrant here resembles that at issue in Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  29. drugs without mentioning any individual, including the owner of the home whom police ultimately arrested. See People v. Summers
    Search
  30. d, Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  31. reliance on United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
    Search
  32. expressed no opinion as to the appropriateness of questioning when an individual was already seized. See United States v. Martinez&nbhyph
    Search
  33. F. 3d, at 1267. Muehler v. Mena
    Search
  34. force is not used on the persons detained, especially when these persons, though lawfully detained under Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  35. use of handcuffs is the use of force, and such force must be objectively reasonable under the circumstances, Graham v. Connor
    Search
  36. on this record it does not appear the restraints were excessive, I join the opinion of the Court. Muehler v. Mena
    Search
  37. Stevens, J., Concurring in Judgment Muehler V. Mena
    Search
  38. s reasonable factual findings, while applying the correct legal standard. See Ornelas v. United
    Search
  39. s discussion of the amount of force used to detain Iris pursuant to Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  40. test announced in Graham v. Connor
    Search
  41. entitled to qualified immunity was not challenged in the petition for certiorari and is therefore waived. See Taylor v. Freeland
    Search
  42. Mena v. Simi
    Search
  43. possession of a small amount of marijuana. Footnote 5 One of the justifications for our decision in Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  44. Michigan v. Summers
    Search
  45. See Graham v. Connor
    Search
  46. Cf. Maryland v. Wilson
    Search
  47. Cf. Illinois v. Caballes
    Search
  48. Petitioners V. Iris
    Search
  49. Illinois v. Caballes
    Search
  50. See Pierce County v. Guillen
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial