Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Brown Vs. Payton

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 22, 2005

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

63 entries 8 linked 55 unlinked
Show
  1. Early Vs. Packer US Supreme Court · Nov 04, 2002
  2. Woodford Vs. Visciotti US Supreme Court · Nov 04, 2002
  3. Lockyer Vs. Andrade US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 2003
    Relied / Followed
  4. Eddings Vs. Oklahoma US Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1982
  5. Lockett Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jul 03, 1978
  6. Boyde Vs. California US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 1990
  7. Woodford Vs. Garceau US Supreme Court · Mar 25, 2003
  8. Penry Vs. Lynaugh US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1989
  9. Syllabus October Term, 2004 Brown V. Payton
    Search
  10. Supreme Court of the United States Brown, Warden V. Payton
    Search
  11. that Payton be sentenced to death, and the judge complied. The California Supreme Court affirmed. Applying Boyde v. California
    Search
  12. affirmed and, like the District Court, held that AEDPA did not apply. On remand from this Court in light of Woodford v. Garceau
    Search
  13. that is materially indistinguishable from a decision of this Court but reaches a different result. E.g., Williams v. Taylor
    Search
  14. in which Stevens and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Rehnquist, C. J., took no part in the decision of the case. Brown v. Payton
    Search
  15. Opinion of the Court Brown V. Payton
    Search
  16. Supreme Court of the United States No. 03-1039 Jill L. Brown, Warden, Petitioner V. William
    Search
  17. People v. Payton
    Search
  18. a sentence of life imprisonment or death, in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  19. s claims and affirmed his convictions and sentence. People v. Payton
    Search
  20. Cal. 4th 1050, 839 P. 2d 1035 (1992). Applying Boyde v. California
    Search
  21. s decision here. We declined to grant certiorari. Payton v. California
    Search
  22. granted the petition. On appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a divided panel reversed. Payton v. Woodford
    Search
  23. s order granting habeas relief. Payton v. Woodford
    Search
  24. s arguments. The State petitioned for certiorari. Pursuant to Woodford v. Garceau
    Search
  25. s petition, Woodford v. Payton
    Search
  26. s deferential standards. See Williams v. Taylor
    Search
  27. s previous grant of habeas relief by the same 6-to-5 vote. Payton v. Woodford
    Search
  28. of facts that is materially indistinguishable from a decision of this Court but reaches a different result. Williams v. Taylor
    Search
  29. s precedents to the facts in an objectively unreasonable manner. Williams v. Taylor
    Search
  30. that the text of factor (k) was broad enough to accommodate the postcrime mitigating evidence Payton presented. People v. Payton
    Search
  31. U. S. 63 , 76 (2003) (quoting Williams v. Taylor
    Search
  32. is reversed. It is so ordered. The Chief Justice took no part in the decision of this case. Brown v. Payton
    Search
  33. s discretion to consider all mitigating evidence does not violate the Eighth Amendment. See Walton v. Arizona
    Search
  34. U. S. 639 , 673 (1990) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). Brown v. Payton
    Search
  35. In a death case, the Constitution requires sentencing juries to consider all mitigating evidence. See, e.g., Penry v. Lynaugh
    Search
  36. namely, evidence of his postcrime religious conversion. Boyde v. California
    Search
  37. s opinion. Brown v. Payton
    Search
  38. Souter, J., Dissenting Brown V. Payton
    Search
  39. record, as well as to any circumstance particular to the offense, that might justify a sentence less than death, Penry v. Lynaugh
    Search
  40. s behavior after the offense, Skipper v. South
    Search
  41. not refuse to consider any evidence in mitigation, or be precluded from giving it whatever effect it may merit. Penry v. Lynaugh
    Search
  42. protecting others in the future by taking a life of one who claims to have been transformed. See, e.g. , Skipper v. South
    Search
  43. People v. Easley
    Search
  44. law, federal and state, that the judge bears ultimate responsibility for instructing a lay jury in the law. Carter v. Kentucky
    Search
  45. Bollenbach v. United
    Search
  46. Quercia v. United
    Search
  47. Sparf v. United
    Search
  48. People v. Roberge
    Search
  49. Applying Boyde v. California
    Search
  50. of Woodford v. Garceau
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial