Citation network
Exxon Mobil Corp. Vs. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 30, 2005
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. SaudiSearch
-
Basic Industries Corp. - 03-1696 (2005) Syllabus October Term, 2004 Exxon Mobil Corp. V. SaudiSearch
-
The Rooker-Feldman doctrine, at issue in this case, has been applied by this Court only twice, in Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
Trust Co ., 263 U. S. 413 , and in District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
Feldman , 460 U. S., at 476, the District Courts lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, see, e.g., Verizon Md. Inc. v. PublicSearch
-
litigation, Rooker-Feldman is not triggered simply by the entry of judgment in state court. See, e.g., McClellan v. CarlandSearch
-
the federal action in favor of the state-court litigation. See, e.g., Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. UnitedSearch
-
Parsons Steel, Inc. v. FirstSearch
-
reversed and remanded. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. SaudiSearch
-
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Chemical Arabia, Inc., and Mobil Yanbu Petrochemi- Cal Company, Inc., Petitioners V. SaudiSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
what has come to be known as the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, applied by this Court only twice, first in Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
Trust Co ., 263 U. S. 413 (1923), then, 60 years later, in District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
See, e.g., Moccio v. NewSearch
-
s judgment. I In Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
Id., at 415, 417. Sixty years later, the Court decided District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
Feldman have done so only in passing or to explain why those cases did not dictate dismissal. See Verizon Md. Inc. v. PublicSearch
-
ASARCO Inc. v. KadishSearch
-
Pennzoil Co. v. TexacoSearch
-
abstaining under Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
s claims necessarily called for review of the merits of its state appeal). See also Martin v. WilksSearch
-
Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. MobilSearch
-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. LocomotiveSearch
-
accord Doran v. SalemSearch
-
Burford v. SunSearch
-
of Tex. v. PullmanSearch
-
accord Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSearch
-
Marrese v. AmericanSearch
-
GASH Assocs. v. VillageSearch
-
accord Noel v. HallSearch
-
F. 3d, at 104 (quoting E. B. v. VernieroSearch
-
s judgment. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
U. S. 462 , 482, n. 16 (1983). Footnote 2 Respondent Saudi Basic Industries Corp. urges that ASARCO Inc. v. KadishSearch
-
decided Rooker , and 1983, when it decided Feldman , the Court cited Rooker in one opinion, Fishgold v. SullivanSearch
-
Drydock & Repair Corp., 328 U. S. 275 , 283 (1946), in reference to the finality of prior judgments. See Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
s dissent from denial of certiorari in Florida State Bd. of Dentistry v. MackSearch
-
the Delaware Supreme Court has affirmed the trial-court judgment in favor of ExxonMobil, Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. MobilSearch
-
Yanbu Petrochemical Co. , 866 A. 2d 1 (2005), and has denied reargument en banc, Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. MobilSearch
-
There is nothing necessarily inappropriate, however, about filing a protective action. See, e.g., Rhines v. WeberSearch
-
Union Pacific R. Co. v. DeptSearch
-
Government of Virgin Islands v. NeadleSearch
-
see also England v. LouisianaSearch
-
Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
Verizon Md. Inc. v. PublicSearch
-
Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial