Citation network
Johnson Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 04, 2005
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 03-9685 (2005) Syllabus October Term, 2004 Johnson V. UnitedSearch
-
e.g. , Apprendi v. NewSearch
-
joined. Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Stevens, Scalia, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 03-9685 (2005) Opinion of the Court Johnson V. UnitedSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 03-9685 Robert Johnson, Jr., Petitioner V. UnitedSearch
-
s career offender findings were not clearly erroneous. United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Id., at 8, n. 1. We denied certiorari. Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
s effective date. Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
Brackett v. UnitedSearch
-
States , 270 F. 3d 60 (CA1 2001) (same), with United States v. GadsenSearch
-
that the validity of a prior conviction supporting an enhanced federal sentence is beyond challenge. Compare Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
a sentence enhanced for a prior conviction is entitled to a reduction if the earlier conviction is vacated. Custis v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Daniels v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 532 U. S. 374 (2001). Such was the premise in Custis v. UnitedSearch
-
obtained in violation of the right to appointed counsel, an exception we thought necessary to avoid undermining Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
U. S. 335 (1963). Custis v. UnitedSearch
-
Id., at 497. Daniels v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. FerbarSearch
-
claim, Daniels v. UnitedSearch
-
s principal purposes, Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
by the Government, indicates only that Johnson claimed invalid waiver of his constitutional rights. United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
party ever argued that his objection could have been litigated under the Gideon exception recognized in Custis v. UnitedSearch
-
motion should have been deemed filed on an earlier date by operation of the so-called prison mailbox rule, see Houston v. LackSearch
-
U. S. 266 (1988). Footnote 3 Hindsight after Daniels v. UnitedSearch
-
would have received notice of vacatur if he had acted promptly, though this may be a difficult showing. Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 03-9685 (2005) Kennedy, J., Dissenting Johnson V. UnitedSearch
-
s position, our opinions in Custis v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 511 U. S. 485 (1994) and Daniels v. UnitedSearch
-
is designed to address myriad claims, including post-trial factual discoveries such as violations of Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
Apprendi v. NewSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Johnson V. UnitedSearch
-
Robert Johnson, Jr., Petitioner V. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
United States v. GadsenSearch
-
Compare Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Custis v. UnitedSearch
-
Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
Kennedy, J., Dissenting Johnson V. UnitedSearch
-
and Daniels v. UnitedSearch
-
of Brady v. MarylandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial