Citation network
Small Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 26, 2005
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Small v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 03-750 (2005) Syllabus October Term, 2004 Small V. UnitedSearch
-
States Supreme Court of the United States Small V. UnitedSearch
-
ordinarily intends its statutes to have domestic, not extraterritorial, application, see, e.g., Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSearch
-
in which Scalia and Kennedy, JJ., joined. Rehnquist, C. J., took no part in the decision of the case. Small v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 03-750 (2005) Opinion of the Court Small V. UnitedSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 03-750 Gary Sherwood Small, Petitioner V. UnitedSearch
-
F. 3d, at 427, n. 2. Because the Circuits disagree about the matter, we granted certiorari. Compare United States v. AtkinsSearch
-
United States v. WinsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
CA6 1986) (same), with United States v. GayleSearch
-
United States v. ConchaSearch
-
See, e.g. , United States v. PalmerSearch
-
Nixon v. MissouriSearch
-
Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. NationalSearch
-
Flora v. UnitedSearch
-
demands a broad interpretation, see, e.g. , United States v. GonzalesSearch
-
Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
Congress ordinarily intends its statutes to have domestic, not extraterritorial, application. See Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSearch
-
EEOC v. ArabianSearch
-
Brief for United States 16 (quoting Dickerson v. NewSearch
-
see also Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Huddleston v. UnitedSearch
-
this opinion. It is so ordered. The Chief Justice took no part in the decision of this case. Small v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 03-750 (2005) Thomas, J., Dissenting Small V. UnitedSearch
-
see also Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSearch
-
Brogan v. UnitedSearch
-
Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
like all other statutory language, must be read in context. E.g. , Deal v. UnitedSearch
-
Small, the Government is enforcing a domestic criminal statute to punish domestic criminal conduct. Pasquantino v. UnitedSearch
-
They restrict federal statutes from applying outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. See Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
Sale v. HaitianSearch
-
Public Citizen v. DepartmentSearch
-
cf. Sturges v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
s guess. Regardless, we have properly rejected this method of guesswork-as-interpretation. In Beecham v. UnitedSearch
-
cf. National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSearch
-
enough. Reliance on silence in the history is a new and even more dangerous phenomenon. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. NighSearch
-
Footnote 4 Nixon v. MissouriSearch
-
Raygor v. RegentsSearch
-
Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Small V. UnitedSearch
-
Gary Sherwood Small, Petitioner V. UnitedSearch
-
Compare United States v. AtkinsSearch
-
United States v. GayleSearch
-
See Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial