Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Tory Vs. Cochran

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 31, 2005

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 2 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Naacp Vs. Button US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1963
  2. Dombrowski Vs. Pfister US Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1965
  3. Syllabus October Term, 2004 Tory V. Cochran
    Search
  4. Souter, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, J., joined. Tory v. Cochran
    Search
  5. Opinion of the Court Tory V. Cochran
    Search
  6. Supreme Court of the United States No. 03-1488 Ulysses Tory, Et Al., Petitioners V. Johnnie
    Search
  7. see Kelly v. Johnson
    Search
  8. a person cannot definitively know whether an injunction is legally void until a court has ruled that it is. See Mason v. United
    Search
  9. People v. Gonzalez
    Search
  10. speech, presenting an ongoing federal controversy. See, e.g. , Dombrowski v. Pfister
    Search
  11. Consequently, we need not, and we do not, dismiss this case as moot. Cf. Firefighters v. Stotts
    Search
  12. now amounts to an overly broad prior restraint upon speech, lacking plausible justification. See Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
    Search
  13. Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh
    Search
  14. As such, the Constitution forbids it. See Carroll v. President
    Search
  15. of Los Angeles v. Jews
    Search
  16. any such new relief, tailored to these changed circumstances, should it be entered. It is so ordered. Tory v. Cochran
    Search
  17. Thomas, J., Dissenting Tory V. Cochran
    Search
  18. ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish
    Search
  19. see also City News & Novelty, Inc. v. Waukesha
    Search
  20. rule, and thus permits collateral challenges to injunctions in contempt proceedings. People v. Gonzalez
    Search
  21. a prudential matter, the better course is to avoid passing unnecessarily on the constitutional question. See Ashwander v. TVA
    Search
  22. Petitioners V. Johnnie
    Search
  23. Kelly v. Johnson
    Search
  24. See Mason v. United
    Search
  25. Cf. Firefighters v. Stotts
    Search
  26. See Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
    Search
  27. See Carroll v. President
    Search
  28. of Los Angeles v. Jews
    Search
  29. City News & Novelty, Inc. v. Waukesha
    Search
  30. See Ashwander v. TVA
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales