Citation network
Gonzales Vs. Raich
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 06, 2005
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2004 Gonzales V. RaichSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Gonzales, Attorney General, Et Al. V. RaichSearch
-
s physician pursuant to valid California state law. The court relied heavily on United States v. LopezSearch
-
U. S. 549 , and United States v. MorrisonSearch
-
that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce is firmly established. See, e.g., Perez v. UnitedSearch
-
Of particular relevance here is Wickard v. FilburnSearch
-
C. J., and Thomas, J., joined as to all but Part III. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Gonzales v. RaichSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Gonzales V. RaichSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 03-1454 Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Et Al., Petitioners V. AngelSearch
-
motion for a preliminary injunction. Raich v. AshcroftSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Raich v. AshcroftSearch
-
Ibid . The majority placed heavy reliance on our decisions in United States v. LopezSearch
-
U. S. 549 (1995), and United States v. MorrisonSearch
-
crop at issue in this case from the cultivation and use of the wheat crop that affected interstate commerce in Wickard v. FilburnSearch
-
underwent a significant transformation. A number of noteworthy events precipitated this policy shift. First, in Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
see also United States v. OaklandSearch
-
none of our Commerce Clause cases can be viewed in isolation. As charted in considerable detail in United States v. LopezSearch
-
authorized to engage under its commerce power. First, Congress can regulate the channels of interstate commerce. Perez v. UnitedSearch
-
NLRB v. JonesSearch
-
quoting Westfall v. UnitedSearch
-
E.g., Lopez , 514 U. S., at 558 (emphasis deleted) (quoting Maryland v. WirtzSearch
-
absent a special concern such as the protection of free speech, see, e.g., Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
see also Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
the dispensing of new drugs, even when doctors approve their use, must await federal approval. United States v. RutherfordSearch
-
legitimate or dire those necessities may be. Wirtz , 392 U. S., at 196 (quoting Sanitary Dist. of Chicago v. UnitedSearch
-
plenary commerce power. See United States v. DarbySearch
-
the findings in the CSA and the undisputed magnitude of the commercial market for marijuana, our decisions in Wickard v. FilburnSearch
-
and the later cases endorsing its reasoning foreclose that claim. v. RespondentsSearch
-
a), 52 Stat. 1059. Footnote 12 See United States v. DoremusSearch
-
Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
Footnote 21 See United States v. MooreSearch
-
access to seriously ill patients, and concluded that it should be reclassified as a Schedule III substance, Grinspoon v. DEASearch
-
s final order. See Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics v. DEASearch
-
F. 3d 1131, 1133 (1994). Footnote 24 United States v. LopezSearch
-
Souter, J., dissenting). Footnote 25 See Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
see also Granholm v. HealdSearch
-
see also Wickard v. FilburnSearch
-
and Monson expresses a willingness to do so in the future. App. 59, 74, 87. See also Department of Revenue of Mont. v. KurthSearch
-
Turner v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Conant v. WaltersSearch
-
that have long since been rejected. See post , at 8 (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment) (quoting McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
h)(12)(A) to (12)(B) (West Supp. 2005). Footnote 40 See, e.g., United States v. MooreSearch
-
time, nearly 20 times more than she uses on a weekly basis. Footnote 43 See, e.g., People ex rel. Lungren v. PeronSearch
-
Scalia, J., Concurring in Judgment Gonzales V. RaichSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial