Citation network
Johnson Vs. California
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 13, 2005
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2004 Johnson V. CaliforniaSearch
-
had failed to establish a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination under the governing state precedent, People v. WheelerSearch
-
California Court of Appeal set aside the conviction, but the State Supreme Court reinstated it, stressing that Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
at 94, then (3) the trial court must decide whether the defendant has proved purposeful racial discrimination, Purkett v. ElemSearch
-
and Breyer, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Johnson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Johnson V. CaliforniaSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 04-6964 Jay Shawn Johnson, Petitioner V. CaliforniaSearch
-
Whether to establish a prima facie case under Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
the challenge was unconstitutionally based on race under both the California and United States Constitutions. People v. JohnsonSearch
-
simply found that petitioner had failed to establish a prima facie case under the governing state precedent, People v. WheelerSearch
-
People v. JohnsonSearch
-
had failed to establish a prima facie case. The California Court of Appeal set aside the conviction. People v. JohnsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Court, prior California case law, and the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Wade v. TerhuneSearch
-
s conviction over the dissent of two justices. The court stressed that Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
We granted certiorari, but dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction because the judgment was not yet final. Johnson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
citing Washington v. DavisSearch
-
see also Alexander v. LouisianaSearch
-
Id., at 96 (citations omitted) (quoting Avery v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U. S., at 93 (quoting Whitus v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Strauder v. WestSearch
-
see also Smith v. TexasSearch
-
in needless and imperfect speculation when a direct answer can be obtained by asking a simple question. See Paulino v. CastroSearch
-
Holloway v. HornSearch
-
Hernandez v. NewSearch
-
s state objection was made under People v. WheelerSearch
-
Ibid. (quoting Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
s prima facie case. Cf. United States ex rel. Vajtauer v. CommissionerSearch
-
framework in cases arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. See, e.g., Furnco Constr. Corp . v. WatersSearch
-
U. S. 567 , 577 (1978) (noting that the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
Honor Center v. HicksSearch
-
quoting Watson v. FortSearch
-
Worth Bank & Trust , 487 U. S. 977 , 986 (1988)). Johnson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
s opinion while maintaining here the views I set forth in my concurring opinion in Miller-El v. DretkeSearch
-
Dickerson v. UnitedSearch
-
People v. WheelerSearch
-
Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
Jay Shawn Johnson, Petitioner V. CaliforniaSearch
-
the California and United States Constitutions. People v. JohnsonSearch
-
Wade v. TerhuneSearch
-
Washington v. DavisSearch
-
Alexander v. LouisianaSearch
-
Avery v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Whitus v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Smith v. TexasSearch
-
See Paulino v. CastroSearch
-
Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Vajtauer v. CommissionerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial