Citation network
Rompilla Vs. Beard
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 2005
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Syllabus October Term, 2004 Rompilla V. BeardSearch
-
a federal habeas petition. The District Court found that the State Supreme Court had unreasonably applied Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
evidence from Rompilla, certain family members, and three mental health experts. The court distinguished Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Scalia and Thomas, JJ., joined. Rompilla v. BeardSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Rompilla V. BeardSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 04-5462 Ronald Rompilla, Petitioner V. JeffreySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and sentenced Rompilla to death. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania affirmed both conviction and sentence. Commonwealth v. RompillaSearch
-
possibilities of a mitigation case, and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the denial of relief. Commonwealth v. RompillaSearch
-
inadequate representation. The District Court found that the State Supreme Court had unreasonably applied Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
s own description of an unexceptional background. Rompilla v. HornSearch
-
A divided Third Circuit panel reversed. Rompilla v. HornSearch
-
s case from Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
to tell them what records might be useful. The Third Circuit denied rehearing en banc by a vote of 6 to 5. Rompilla v. HornSearch
-
s resolution of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
supra, at 520 (quoting Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
quoting Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
counsel may draw a line when they have good reason to think further investigation would be a waste. See Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
U. S., at 524 (quoting Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
s efforts were enough to free them from any obligation to enquire further. Commonwealth v. RompillaSearch
-
and so we examine this element of the Strickland claim de novo , Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
Wiggins , 539 U. S., at 538 (quoting Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
s other claim, under Simmons v. SouthSearch
-
located in the prior conviction file, reasonable efforts would have led counsel to this information. Rompilla v. BeardSearch
-
O'Connor, J., Concurring Rompilla V. BeardSearch
-
s performance was unconstitutionally deficient under Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
strategy instead would be to jettison that argument so as to focus on other, more promising issues. Cf. Yarborough v. GentrySearch
-
called for under our cases, Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
U. S. 362 , 391 (2000), I join the opinion. Rompilla v. BeardSearch
-
Kennedy, J., Dissenting Rompilla V. BeardSearch
-
his body had been set on fire. Substantial evidence linked Rompilla to the crime. See generally Commonwealth v. RompillaSearch
-
s 1974 conviction for rape, burglary, and theft. See Commonwealth v. RompillaSearch
-
U. S., at 688. See also Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
U. S. 63 , 75 (2003) (citing Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
Commonwealth v. RompillaSearch
-
d). Holland v. JacksonSearch
-
Ronald Rompilla, Petitioner V. JeffreySearch
-
Rompilla v. HornSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
See Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
Simmons v. SouthSearch
-
Cf. Yarborough v. GentrySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial