Citation network
Mayle Vs. Felix
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 23, 2005
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2004 Mayle V. FelixSearch
-
in Tiller v. AtlanticSearch
-
of the police interrogation, specifically, did Felix answer voluntarily or were his statements coerced. See Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
-
Thomas, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Souter, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Stevens, J., joined. Mayle v. FelixSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Mayle V. FelixSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 04-563 Deneice a. Mayle, Warden, Petitioner V. JacobySearch
-
Ellzey v. UnitedSearch
-
CA7 2003) (same), with United States v. HicksSearch
-
United States v. Espinoza-SaenzSearch
-
Davenport v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. PittmanSearch
-
United States v. DuffusSearch
-
United States v. CraycraftSearch
-
as capacious as the construction the Ninth and Seventh Circuits have adopted for habeas cases. Compare Maegdlin v. InternationalSearch
-
Clipper Exxpress v. RockySearch
-
Santana v. HolidaySearch
-
Rural Fire Protection Co. v. HeppSearch
-
pay periods, amendment asserting the same type of violation during an additional pay period related back), with Nettis v. LevittSearch
-
Sierra Club v. PenfoldSearch
-
did not relate back). See also Jackson v. SuffolkSearch
-
Citing Chavez v. MartinezSearch
-
but at the police interrogation, specifically, did he answer voluntarily or were his statements coerced. See Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
-
Congress enacted AEDPA to advance the finality of criminal convictions. See Rhines v. WeberSearch
-
does not mean repeal. See Fuller v. MarxSearch
-
concerns, see Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
see Ellzey v. UnitedSearch
-
convictions. Footnote 4 Habeas corpus proceedings are characterized as civil in nature. See, e.g., Fisher v. BakerSearch
-
standards governing successive habeas petitions, standards that do not track the Restatement of Judgments, see Schlup v. DeloSearch
-
with a view to the relation back concept employed in Rule 15(c)(2). Footnote 7 For example, in Mandacina v. UnitedSearch
-
CA8 2003), the original petition alleged violations of Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
obtained at the same time by the same police department. The Court of Appeals approved relation back. And in Woodward v. WilliamsSearch
-
based on the alleged pretrial extraction of damaging statements from Felix. Ordinarily, as we observed in Halbert v. MichiganSearch
-
quoting Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
see Pennsylvania v. FinleySearch
-
n. 8. Mayle v. FelixSearch
-
Souter, J., Dissenting Mayle V. FelixSearch
-
presumably say no, for example, in the face of unjustifiable delay or threatened prejudice to the State. See Foman v. DavisSearch
-
pleading standard for the benefit of ordinary civil plaintiffs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), see Conley v. GibsonSearch
-
ground for relief, whatever may be the conduct, transaction, or occurrence out of which the claims arise. As Tiller v. AtlanticSearch
-
term not only goes to the breadth of relation back, but also to the scope of claim preclusion. E.g. , Kremer v. ChemicalSearch
-
intended for purposes of claim preclusion in habeas cases. Judge Easterbrook explained this tension in Ellzey v. UnitedSearch
-
that in the overwhelming majority of cases, the original petition is the work of a pro se petitioner. See Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
each in response to a different proposed tariff amendment) as one transaction or occurrence, see Clipper Exxpress v. RockySearch
-
rather than the custody obtained by use at trial of the fruits of that conduct. Cf. ante , at 12 (citing Jackson v. SuffolkSearch
-
see generally Wilkinson v. DotsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial